Search for: "Law v. United States" Results 881 - 900 of 62,734
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2010, 9:47 am by brian
,  Holding: A defendant is subject to the highest mandatory minimum specified for his conduct in 18 U.S.C. 924(c) unless another provision of law directed to conduct proscribed by Section 924(c) specifically imposes an even greater mandatory minimum sentence. [read post]
9 May 2023, 6:45 am by Unknown
Interdiction at Sea," Univ. of Miami International & Comparative Law Review, vol. 30, no. 1 (Dec. 2022) [full-text] "Remote evaluations for humanitarian parole of asylum seekers to the United States: The case of MA," Torture Journal: Journal on Rehabilitaiton of Torture Victims and Prevention of Torture, vol. 33, no. 1 (2023) [open access] "Strengths and Resilience Among Central American Parents Seeking… [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States exemplifies what I have come to regard as a systematic inattention to remedial questions in administrative law. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In 1979, the United States Supreme Court in Addington v Texas held that constitutional due process required the government to prove two statutory preconditions by clear and convincing evidence before a court could commit an individual to a mental institution: (1) that the person sought to be committed is mentally ill; and (2) that such person requires hospitalization for his own welfare and protection of others. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 1:52 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Erin Murphy (New York University School of Law) has posted Back to the Future: The Curious Case of United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 4:12 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Clancy (West Virginia University College of Law) has posted United States v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 8:42 am by Eugene R. Fidell
(left), upheld an order refusing to extradite Abdullah Khadr (brother of Omar Khadr) to the United States. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:23 am
For example, the decision states that a district court does not have the power to suspend a sentence, citing United States v. [read post]