Search for: "Long Corporation v. the United States" Results 881 - 900 of 3,660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2023, 2:35 pm by Rob Robinson
These investigations can be a long and costly process for the corporation, and cooperation is not always a guarantee for a better outcome. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 2:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Securities class action litigation has been an important part of the corporate and securities litigation environment in the United States and Canada for many years. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 2:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Securities class action litigation has been an important part of the corporate and securities litigation environment in the United States and Canada for many years. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As described below, state, federal and international breach notification laws arguably do not apply to ransomware attacks because no corporate data is actually pilfered. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 10:11 am by Wells Bennett
For my money, Paul is probably correct in pointing to some long-run consequences of this week’s FTC v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 10:30 am by Lisa McElroy
Roberts, Jr., the Chief Justice of the United States? [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:33 am
AFSCME and several state pension funds, including the nation's largest, the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), sent letters to the SEC in mid-November urging Cox to let the AFSCME v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 7:23 am by Beth Graham
A United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit panel has issued an interesting ruling in a case involving arbitration. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am by Erin Miller
UPDATE, Jan. 7: Today United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:45 am by Kevin LaCroix
In its January 10, 2012 opinion in CompuCredit v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 10:00 pm by Dan Flynn
But with the case of the United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 10:22 am by Mavrick Law Firm
Nov. 27, 2012), the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida held that a non-compete agreement was not necessary to enter a temporary restraining order against a former  employee for misappropriation of trade secrets. [read post]