Search for: "Long v. State"
Results 881 - 900
of 45,615
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
The second case cited was Shapiro v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 10:14 am
Earlier coverage of Maples v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 12:48 pm
LGBTQ Harassment Consistent with its long-standing position amplified by the Bostock v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 8:10 am
To this, the Court relied on the case of Ciszkowski v. [read post]
31 May 2014, 11:13 am
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:44 am
Essentially, the court restated old law that states an abstract idea is not patentable. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 6:34 am
In Ash v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:32 am
Soto v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 2:28 pm
Olive v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 7:58 am
In Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:00 pm
Facts of Shaw v Reno As a result of the 1990 census, North Carolina became entitled to a 12th seat in the United States House of Representatives. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 6:16 am
State v. [read post]
14 May 2017, 1:56 pm
On May 14, 1973, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Frontiero v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 4:00 pm
The request was accompanied by a doctor’s note stating that the car accident had “exacerbated” Eghtesad’s back pain, such that he was unable to sit for long time without changing position, and that the doctor expected him to recover in three months. [read post]
2 May 2007, 3:46 am
Supreme Court delivered its long-awaited opinion in KSR International Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 2:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
Presiding Judge Keller goes on to note that many other states have addressed the delegation question with respect to criminal penalties, but the weight of authority cut against Rhine's position. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:25 pm
However, the CJEU's decision in Roche v Primus rejected this strategy. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
In Rosenruist-Gestao E servicos LDA v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 8:35 am
The title of this post comes from this intriguing paper by Professor Douglas Berman, the abstract of which states: In his dissent in McCleskey v. [read post]
