Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 881 - 900
of 4,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:33 pm
The Court: The State of Texas v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 4:31 am
The Court: The State of Texas v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 4:03 am
Also of interest in this case is the court’s reference to Lord Sumption’s judgment in Zakrzewski v District Court in Torun, Poland [2013] UKSC 2, which stated that “as a general rule the court of the executing state is bound to take the statements and information in the warrant at face value. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 3:35 am
Of course, this may not be that issue and the Supreme Court may just follow Lord Bingham in Kay v Lambeth. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 11:33 am
This is certainly consistent with the reasoning in Samsung v Apple [2012] EWHC 1882 (Pat), which considered the surface decoration on the accused product, despite that Apple’s CRD for the iPad was depicted in line drawings. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:22 am
The Court of Appeal, in overturning Mr Justice Birss' decision, found the patent invalid for lack of inventive step (Actavis v ICOS [2017] EWCA Civ 1671). [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
Yesterday the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Lords Justices Rix, Lloyd and Wilson) gave its ruling in Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd, [2009] EWCA Civ 753.At issue in this dispute was the shape of Whirlpool's retro-looking KitchenAid Artisan mixer and its rival, Kenwood's kMix. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:22 am
Arnold J considered the criteria set down by the Court of Appeal in Novartis v Hospira [2013], but noted that it was of concern that Lord Hoffman’s judgment in the Privy Council case National Commercial Bank Jamaica v Olint [2009] had not been cited. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:44 am
Lord Dyson MR, Richards and Black LJJ held that SIAC had no power to impose bail conditions on B because his detention was unlawful. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 6:18 am
Lord Wilson observed that, where it is necessary to attribute a human state of mind to a company, it is necessary to determine which persons’ mental processes will count as those of the company. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 2:18 am
Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson conclude that there was no basis for the presumption and, accordingly, the judge erred in dismissing the appellant’s application relying on that observation. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:08 pm
-Gen. v Punch Ltd [2003] 1 AC 1046 at [87]-[88] in the Court of Appeal and at [95] in the House of Lords; and Jockey Club v Buffham [2003] QB 462 (Gray J). [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:58 am
Lord Baltimore Capital Corp., C.A. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
Fourthly, in Majrowski the House of Lords he [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 1:24 pm
Phillips, 4 Wheat. 73 (1819); Lord v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 4:16 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) K v L [2011] EWCA Civ 550 (13 May 2011) AXA Sunlife Services Plc v Campbell Martin Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 549 (12 May 2011) BDW Trading Ltd (t/a Barratt North London) v JM Rowe (Investments) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 548 (12 May 2011) AP (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 551 (12 May 2011) Kennedy v The Information Commissioner & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 367… [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:50 am
Decision Lord Hamblen delivered the only judgment, with which all the other Lord Justices agreed. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:58 am
What kind of a defence does Lord Brown mean? [read post]
