Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 881 - 900
of 3,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2020, 1:13 am
One should do the work to convince the Tribunal that the criteria had been reached. 1255: Lord Leggatt asks when the Tribunal should consider compensation? [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:29 am
” [9] The Court also noted that the English courts (in subsequent cases such as Pearce v United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust and Chester v Afshar) had quietly ceased to follow Sidaway‘s adoption of the Bolam test. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:42 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) R. v SVS Solicitors [2012] EWCA Crim 319 (15 February 2012) A v B & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 285 (14 March 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Maqsood v Mahmood & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 251 (13 March 2012) JD (Congo) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 327 (16 March 2012) Barr & Ors v Biffa Waste Services Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 312 (19 March 2012) High Court… [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:00 am
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:23 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:45 am
This issue was considered at length in Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2008] QB 103. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking Group… [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:26 am
Lord Neuberger and Lord Mance, however, did state that although this was an inappropriate case in which to decide the proper approach to the defence of illegality, there was a need for review of the law of illegality by the Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:37 am
In giving the lead judgment, Lord Sumption stated that the fundamental principle of the common law of damages is the compensatory principle. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 1:38 am
The lead judgment was given by Lord Neuberger (with which Lord Sumption, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge agreed). [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:29 am
Supreme Court Judgment The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed Mr Williams’s appeal and upheld the Court of Appeal’s decision, Lord Carnwarth giving the sole judgment. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:34 am
Comment Lord Walker concluded his judgment on the expenditure issue by confirming that the previous House of Lords decisions in this area (namely, Ensign Tankers and Barclays Mercantile) remain good law. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm
The state is under various obligations under Article 2. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
Paris v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:03 pm
re v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:03 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Clarke v R [2012] EWCA Crim 9 (20 January 2012) Oliver, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 3114 (21 December 2011) Lawrence, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 3129 (16 December 2011) Court of Appeal (Civi Division) Eastenders Cash & Carry Plc & Ors v HM Revenue & Customs [2012] EWCA Civ 15 (20 January 2012) Star Reefers Pool Inc v JFC Group Co Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 14 (20 January 2012) Charnock & Ors v Rowan &… [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:35 am
Lord Hope based [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
