Search for: "MARTINEZ v. STATE"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,777
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm
Nineteen other defendants were arrested in Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Florida, and Texas and were expected to appear in federal courts in those states. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 4:50 am
Martinez-Vargas v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:24 am
Martinez, N.M. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:28 am
A 2012 Supreme Court ruling, Martinez v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:52 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has flat out refused to follow the Supreme Court’s March 2012 Martinez v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:35 pm
Thaler, thereby preventing prisoners from the country's most active death penalty state from having access to Martinez's protections. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:51 am
And so Hearn got double burned.As alarms go off everywhere but Texas, the Supreme Court's ruling in Martinez v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
This week at the AFCCA: The Air Force CCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:40 am
Here, accepting as true the facts alleged in the complaint and according the plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88; AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State St. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:36 am
In Texas, the perpetually rogue Fifth Circuit, in an opinion dripping with disdain for the justices in Washington, has just refused to apply the precedent established in Martinez v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
To succeed on a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1), the documentary evidence relied on by the defendant must "conclusively establish[ ] a defense to the asserted claims as a matter of law" (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]). [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 5:40 am
Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]), the CFAA does not encompass Jacob's misappropriation of information that he lawfully accessed while working for plaintiffs or misuse of work computers in violation of their computer policies (see United States v Nosal, 676 F3d 854 [9th Cir. 2012]; see also University Sports Publs. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 1:36 pm
The rule of Martinez v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:41 am
The Court next considered whether application of Martinez v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:30 am
In Coneff v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:41 am
Martinez. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:30 am
Tex. 1990), aff'd sub. nom., U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
The federal discrimination laws, and the parallel state anti-discrimination statutes, prohibit discrimination. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:46 am
Cooper and Martinez v. [read post]