Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 881 - 900
of 20,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Obviously, this depends on the breadth of the claimed subject-matter and on the relevant skilled person. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 6:00 am
Only one is actually in our network, and the location the patient's supposed to go to isn't. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 5:00 am
B. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
See T 336/07 [3.3.1]. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:54 am
Relatedly: The applicant’s viewpoint about the term or the targeted group matters not at all. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 8:54 am
It doesn't look or smell like it will be fair. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
Therefore, the [opponent’s] objection in effect merely relates to the determination of the exact scope of the claim, which is a matter of A 84 rather than A 83. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
The claims as granted comprise two independent claims : claim 1 relating to a composition consisting of (a), (b) and (c).and claim 11 relating to a dietary supplement for the prevention of inflammatory processes and articular disorders consisting of an admixture of (a) and (b), wherein the wording of features (a) and (b) are identical for both claims. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:00 am
I usually find a hidden account when someone is sloppy: a transfer to a bank that we didn’t know about, no matter how large or small the amount. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 11:00 am
T 939/92 [2.5.3] or T 311/95 [2.5.7]). [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 10:37 am
§ 3553(f)(1)(A)–(C) (emphasis added).1 As a matter of first impression, we must interpret the “and” joining subsections (A), (B), and (C) under § 3553(f)(1). [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 2:08 pm
Below we flag some examples of situations in which you may need to file – a compliance program that won’t catch these isn’t doing its job.Exchange of one type of interest in a company for anotherAcquisition of some kinds of interests in companies are reportable, while others are not. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm
Independent claims in the same category; R 29(2) EPC 1973[4.3] As set out in the appealed decision, the subject-matter claimed in the independent method claims 1 and 10, as well as the subject-matter claimed in the independent apparatus claims 3 and 12, does not involve any of the exceptions (a), (b) or (c) mentioned under R 29(2) EPC 1973. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 11:01 am
The test for deciding whether an amendment contains subject-matter extending beyond the content of the application as filed is whether the skilled person would be presented with information which is not directly and unambiguously derivable from what was presented by the application as filed, even when account is taken of matter which is implicit to a person skilled in the art (Guidelines C VI-5.3.1, December 2007). [2.2.2] The objected feature specifies that when the first rotor… [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:00 am
See Weighted Voting Doesn’t Work: A Mathematical Analysis, 19 Rutgers Law Review 317 (1965). [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 11:01 am
Question (b) has therefore to be answered in the negative. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:14 am
Rule 60(b). [read post]
15 May 2017, 2:32 am
The Examining Division decided that the subject-matter of claims 1 and 9 of the main request contained added subject-matter. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:05 am
Introduction of any diluting stimuli causes dilution w/r/t all marks; they didn’t notice this super-dilution result from surprise w/Mercedes toothpaste b/c they didn’t test for it. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:16 am
But interest in knowing who created the design isn’t the same as interest in who created the particular copy, and that matters if we want to maintain a distinction b/t TM and ©/design patent; those are the regimes charged w/dealing w/content itself, rather than source designation of content.Perry Saidman, Saidman Design Law Group, “Design Patent Functionality”The line b/t design & utility patent: thesis is that there… [read post]
