Search for: "MATTER OF J C B"
Results 881 - 900
of 3,065
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2019, 4:37 pm
Resources Code, § 21155(b).) [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:16 pm
See Lawrence B. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 9:24 am
[B.] [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
§ 924(c)(3)(B) was unconstitutionally vague and invalidated the statute. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:30 am
" As a general matter, a Plaintiff only has standing to challenge a specific provision of law that provision injures her. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
54(3)(b), if the alteration is made effective by an order pursuant to s. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:44 pm
The patent, granted in 2011, had been opposed on the grounds of Article 100(c), 100(b) and 100(a) EPC for lack of novelty and inventive step.In the appealed decision, the opposition division had held that the process claimed in auxiliary request 10 did not add subject-matter and that it was novel. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm
JOpinion Editor’s note: Gary M. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 12:58 pm
Mole’s profit stays the same no matter how many boulders she encounters. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 10:29 am
In doing that, the plaintiffs’ evidence is accepted as true, and the defendants’ evidence is evaluated only to determine if it defeats the plaintiffs’ showing as a matter of law. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:41 pm
” The event will feature a conversation between Michael O’Hanlon, Director of Research in the Foreign Policy program and General Paul J. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:17 pm
C. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 10:53 am
Donald C. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 2:17 pm
organization/registrant/owner/client: Clocktower Law LLC | GiantPeople LLC firstname: Erik J. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
| Skykick - why does it matter & what could it mean for trade marks? [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 12:21 am
CHAMBERS LEONARD B. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:04 pm
A matter of statutory interpretation. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 11:58 am
The conversation will also feature John J. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
The Administrative Law Judge found, upon the hearing, that a preponderance of the evidence showed that the petitioner committed a category three act of neglect (see Social Services Law §§493[3][a][i]; [4][c]; 494[1][a]; 14 NYCRR 624.5[j][1][i]; 700.4-700.5). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:38 am
In Matter of Capital Enters. [read post]
