Search for: "MATTER OF R B" Results 881 - 900 of 14,568
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2021, 1:52 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The Court succinctly summarised the matter as "generally, on a fair reading of ss. 15(1)(b) and 15(1)(c), a patent can be granted to a legal person for an invention with an artificial intelligence system or device as the inventor".Ultimately what the case focused on is whether a valid patent application has been made, rather than who will own any patent that might be granted in the future. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 2:15 pm by Sam Bowman & Geoffrey Manne
However, Section 2(b), which lists types of conduct that would presumptively establish a violation under Section 2(a), is largely unchanged. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
Introduction Say that I accurately write that you have been convicted of a crime, but I knowingly fail to mention that the conviction has been reversed.[1] To make the matter particularly stark, say the conviction has been reversed on grounds that show you were innocent (rather than just for procedural reasons). [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 11:18 pm by Ralf Michaels
On the other hand, the opportunities of cross-cutting soft law instruments, such as the guiding principles for the realization of gender equality, also in cross-border matters, should not be negated but further explored. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 4:01 am by Saloni Khanderia
In matters of intellectual property such as these, the Act confers the Commercial Court or the Commercial Division of the High Court in some states with the exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate such matters, which were initially within the domain of the District Courts. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:42 am by Eric S. Solotoff
Rule 4:50-2 provides that the motion should be made in a response time, “… and for reasons (a), (b) and (c) of R. 4:50-1 not more than one year after the judgment, order or proceeding was entered or taken. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:42 am by Eric S. Solotoff
Rule 4:50-2 provides that the motion should be made in a response time, “… and for reasons (a), (b) and (c) of R. 4:50-1 not more than one year after the judgment, order or proceeding was entered or taken. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 9:19 am by Eric Goldman
Patent venue rules (28 U.S.C. 1400(b)) are different from rules of personal jurisdiction, and in 2018 and 2019, Judge Rodney Gilstrap of the U.S. [read post]
SJSU fired another employee (Employee B) for failing to meet with Employee A because Employee B did not wish to retaliate against Employee A for reporting sexual harassment, including sexual assault. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 7:17 pm by Josh Blackman
It does not matter that the Arkansas and Texas defendants have no connection to the Illinois federal forum. [read post]
In a recent decision, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court – Switzerland’s highest court also in patent matters – dealt with the question of whether the assessment of patent claims is fundamentally a question of law or a question of fact. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 2:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the Matter of Pearson plc is among a recent string of SEC administrative cases brought by the agency against a public company that was not alleged to have engaged in intentional misconduct, fraud, and the like. [read post]