Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 881 - 900
of 42,185
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2018, 3:00 am
The District Court thus ruled that because the plaintiff brought a traditional class action suit and sought certification under Rule 23, the Daleys did not have to show that at least one plaintiff’s damages exceeded $75,000. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 3:00 am
The District Court thus ruled that because the plaintiff brought a traditional class action suit and sought certification under Rule 23, the Daleys did not have to show that at least one plaintiff’s damages exceeded $75,000. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 3:00 am
The District Court thus ruled that because the plaintiff brought a traditional class action suit and sought certification under Rule 23, the Daleys did not have to show that at least one plaintiff’s damages exceeded $75,000. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 11:29 am
The person who files first will be able to tell their story first, present their evidence first, and force the beginning of the process. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 6:23 pm
P. 166a(c) or a no-evidence motion under Rule 166a(i), unless the extension -TRAD and -NE are added.Litigation guides and manuals also use such abbreviations, for reasons of space and economy. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 10:29 pm
At present, the rules that apply to spoliation of evidence require the application of state law in federal question cases such as this one. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 10:47 am
At present, the rules that apply to spoliation of evidence require the application of state law in federal question cases such as this one. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
Here is the abstract: The debate over standards versus rules has been framed as a trade-off between the certainty and lower administrative costs of rules versus the greater flexibility to base decisions on case-specific evidence with standards. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 1:58 pm
Proposed Opinion 20-2 (Revised) concerns whether a lawyer who represents a defendant in a criminal matter violates the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct if, after receiving tangible evidence from the lawyer’s client, the lawyer does not reveal the existence of the evidence until trial and refuses to allow the prosecuting attorney to inspect the evidence until the court orders the lawyer to do so. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 7:25 am
We are extremely familiar with the relevant substantive law and procedural rules, and we use that familiarity to our clients’ advantage. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
The plaintiffs challenged the defendant’s evidence as inadmissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence, arguing that statements in the declaration did not satisfy the business records exception to the prohibition on hearsay and that the statements violate the best evidence rule. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Pension Fund, 185 AD3d 812, and as a general rule, the decision by CERS will not be disturbed unless its factual findings are not supported by substantial evidence* or its final determination and ruling is arbitrary and capricious". [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Pension Fund, 185 AD3d 812, and as a general rule, the decision by CERS will not be disturbed unless its factual findings are not supported by substantial evidence* or its final determination and ruling is arbitrary and capricious". [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 6:56 am
The rules for pleading are different. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:32 pm
Error #1: The court has no jurisdiction over this matter. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 6:02 pm
We also elaborate on how the Secretariat’s role matters, affecting the role of precedent, the low number of dissents, and the increasing length of proceedings and scope of rulings. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 12:41 pm
Attorney Novak is a dedicated Arizona criminal defense attorney with extensive experience handling a wide variety of complex criminal matters, including Arizona gun crimes, property crimes, and drug crimes. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 11:00 am
While the law of evidence provides a basic structure for the resolution of these issues, some matters must be decided on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 10:50 am
He prosecuted his claim in the usual course (outside of Rule 68) and set the matter for a 5 day Jury Trial. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:12 pm
.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled that social media posts are inadmissible in criminal cases unless prosecutors can present evidence of who actually authored the commentary.The court ruled in this fashion after noting that social media accounts can be easily hacked or faked. [read post]
