Search for: "Mark E. Howe" Results 881 - 900 of 7,578
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2019, 10:55 am
Another perspective on the ‘Fortnite’ lawsuits | CHEESE for (cannabis) seeds not a valid trade mark, says EUIPO First Board of Appeal | So just how much is the iPhone aspirational? [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 3:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Even assuming that the mark was valid and noninfringing, the mark wouldn’t allow them to misappropriate the goodwill of the original BXI exchange business. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:14 am by John L. Welch
[Not to mention the time of paralegals and legal assistance who no longer have to testify about when and how they downloaded documents.]Text Copyright John L. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 3:14 am by John L. Welch
JOE'S COFFEETest Your TTAB Judge-Ability: How Confident Are You About Deciding This Section 2(d) Gardening Case? [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 1:40 pm by Mills & Mills LLP
Intention to use the marks – Sections 30(e) and (I) Sections 30(e) and (i) required that the applicant must demonstrate intent to use the mark in Canada in association with specific goods and services. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 9:03 pm by Darin Detwiler
The recent Supreme Court decision to eliminate Chevron deference marks a pivotal shift in how federal agencies interpret and enforce laws. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 2:04 am by John L. Welch
" The Examining Attorney maintained that the term SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT MATRIX identifies a technology, not the source of the UV curing system.The critical issue concerned how the relevant public would perceive the mark; for example, whether the alleged mark would be perceived as identifying the source of the goods, or merely as an informational phrase. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 2:15 pm
One entry (should that be entrée?) [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 7:00 am by Bob Ambrogi
  The new tool is available for customers of Aderant’s BillBlast e-billing product in the U.S. and Canada. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 4:29 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
The Examining Attorney refused to register either mark under Section 2(e)(1) of the Trademark Act of 1945, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 2:40 pm by Steven Boutwell
In more sophisticated companies, this may be provided in a specified telework agreement; others may rely on published policies and e-mails that specify how this information should be accessed and used. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 3:28 pm by Nikki Siesel
This case serves as a good example of how to prove there is “something more” commercially relating restaurant services and alcoholic beverages. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 3:47 am
Rodriquez, 99 USPQ2d 1873, 1877 (TTAB 2011).Asserted Claims: The Board dismissed with prejudice Curtin's Section 2(e)(5) functionality claim because Section 2(e)(5) "has no bearing on an application to register a word mark. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 4:27 pm
” FSIS drastically shifted how it interpreted and enforced the FMIA in 1994 when, following the Jack in the Box outbreak, the agency declared E. coli O157:H7 to be an adulterant. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 8:28 pm
” FSIS drastically shifted how it interpreted and enforced the FMIA in 1994 when, following the Jack in the Box outbreak, the agency declared E. coli O157:H7 to be an adulterant. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 7:17 am by Bob Ambrogi
In this guest post, Laura Lee Norris, director of the program, and Mark Michels, lecturer in law, describe the program and how it prepares students for careers as tech lawyers in Silicon Valley. [read post]