Search for: "Matter of David B."
Results 881 - 900
of 3,125
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2019, 12:09 pm
Kimball, David B. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Tony Yang, George Washington University, Vaccine Sentiment and the Outcomes of Legislative Bills B. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 7:07 am
Menell and David Nimmer in a separate submission also highlight inconsistency with SCOTUS’s seminal decision in Baker v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 6:11 am
Notably, Annex B divides the appendices into two categories—those “that may be amended only by board agreement” and those “which the directors, NSA and GCHQ, may change or interpret by mutual agreement. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 6:18 am
Geltzer, Mary B. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 2:19 pm
As explained in David Engstrom’s preview, the law’s original statute of limitations, Section 3731(b)(1), requires lawsuits to be filed within six years of the alleged fraud. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 1:45 pm
David Kritz (david.kritz@dodiis.mil). [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 12:59 pm
David Watts, but Hately did not change his email password. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 6:16 am
Key Findings The cost basis of property transferred at death receives a “step-up” in basis to its fair market value. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
§ 9705(g)(4)(B) provides that, where there are “unobligated balances” remaining in the Fund after the Treasury has set aside certain amounts as required by statute, such balances “shall be available to the Secretary . [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
Now it seems to me that there is no First Amendment exception for speech that the judge views as being "born out of a vendetta," or even as "seeking to cause mental distress"; but even to the extent there are exceptions for, say, defamation, or true threats, or perhaps even speech on matters of private concern that's "extreme and outrageous" and intended to cause severe emotional distress, that can't justify an overbroad, categorical "shall… [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 8:13 am
Key Findings Personal saving and investment are necessary for long-term economic growth. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
David Petraeus (Ret.), Suzanne Spaulding, Evan Wolff and moderator Jane Harman. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 12:11 pm
Why does the case matter? [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Many of the citations deal with eminently practical matters, but the courts have also thought it beneficial to call upon the philosophers for a variety of more strictly “philosophic” notions, for example, Thomas Aquinas on the doctrine of free will, and Bertrand Russell on logical constructions. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
New York,3 that the Supreme Court matter-of-factly held that the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment was “of course” applicable to the states.4 To justify incorporation, Penn Central cited only one 19th century case, which itself did not mention the Fifth Amendment.5 Before Penn Central, the Court relied on the Due Process Clause to restrict the scope of state taking power. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:15 pm
Jordan and Aaron David Miller. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 9:45 am
Rogers, Richard B. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 4:56 pm
(B) to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct; See above. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 5:04 am
As a constitutional matter, I think this argument and analogous arguments made (less coherently) by Trump administration defenders have things backwards. [read post]
