Search for: "Matter of Washington Group, Inc." Results 881 - 900 of 1,140
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2010, 5:26 pm by Embassy Law
In a 14 page opinion, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia affirmed the District Court in the matter MBI Group, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Paul Bland
  ATTM argued that even if a ban on class actions would be illegal in other contexts as a matter of Washington law, the FAA preempted Washington law in Scott because the company had put its class-action ban in its arbitration clause. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 12:14 pm by James R. Marsh
No private organization or entity, no matter how well-meaning or well-funded, should have any official or unofficial role in this essential governmental mission. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
Colan Associates of Florida, LLC and The Jones Payne Group, Inc., of Mass., have agreed to pay $25,000 for alleged violations of the federal Clean Air Act and National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Asbestos. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 8:30 am by Transplanted Lawyer
  El-Gamal is also affiliated with a group called the Cordoba Initiative. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm by Steven M. Taber
The settlement came after EPA found that Oxarc, Inc. was in violation of the Risk Management Program requirements at four of their facilities which are located in North Lewiston and Nampa, Idaho and Pasco and Spokane, Washington. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 6:39 am by Adam Chandler
Washington, DC’s FOX5 has an interview with CQ Politics’s Seth Stern on the criticism that Kagan is receiving from both liberal and conservative groups on her views on abortion. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:13 am
http://tinyurl.com/25fkbfw eDiscovery Events June Event Update Gartner Security & Risk Management Summit June 21-23, 2010 National Harbor, MD (Washington, DC area) Click here for more information. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 2:20 am by gmlevine
Generally, regardless of the subject matter of the website and as long as there is no infringement of the complainant’s rights, “[domain names] registered because of their attraction as dictionary words, and not because of their value as trademarks [do not contravene the Policy],” The Landmark Group v. [read post]