Search for: "McGinnis"
Results 881 - 900
of 909
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2007, 11:49 am
In the final analysis, supermajoritarianism notwithstanding, we are left to debate the merits of originalism on the same terms as before McGinnis and Rappaport's current intervention. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 3:38 am
Leib's interesting paper, a response to McGinnis and Rappaport, A Pragmatic Defense of Originalism is also available on the Northwestern University Law Review's Colloquy. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 8:27 am
In the final analysis, supermajoritarianism notwithstanding, we are left to debate the merits of originalism on the same terms as before McGinnis and Rappaport's current intervention. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 4:32 am
McGinnis and it's always a treat. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 9:55 am
McGinnis & Rappaport's contribution is up at SSRN. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 8:19 am
McGinnis and Michael B. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 1:09 pm
Thought you folks might be interested in the happenings: Friday, February 9, 2007 12-1:15pm Welcoming Lunch 1:30-5:00pm Session One Topic is “Constitutional Treatment of Antiterrorism Strategies” (1 paper on topic: David Barron & Martin Lederman, “The Lowest Ebb: Statutory Limits on the Commander-in-Chief and the War on Terrorism”) 5:45pm Dinner at “Upstairs on the Square” Saturday, February 10, 2007 8:30-9am Continental Breakfast… [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 6:02 am
JOHN MCGINNIS AND ILYA SOMIN: Should International Law Be Part of Our Law? [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 8:22 am
McGinnis and Ilya Somin (Northwestern University - School of Law and George Mason University - School of Law) have posted Should International Law Be Part of Our Law? [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 11:38 am
You can already get many of the articles on SSRN: Jack Balkin: Abortion and Original Meaning Randy Barnett: Underlying Principles Ethan J Leib: The Perpetual Anxiety of Living Constitutionalism Mitchell Berman: Originalism and Its Discontents It is a fun group of papers -- and others are expected from Mike Rappaport (with co-author John McGinnis), Mike Paulsen, Sandy Levinson, and Dawn Johnsen. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 4:39 am
McGinnis and Michael B. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 12:45 am
One aspect of my paper with John McGinnis on supermajority rules and originalism bears emphasis: the paper attempts to explain why the Constitution is great. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 11:54 am
My piece (with John McGinnis) arguing for originalism based on the supermajoritarian enactment and amendment of the Constitution has now been finalized and is available here at SSRN. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 10:07 pm
So McGinnis & Rappaport have uploaded their "Pragmatic Defense of Originalism" to SSRN and the Northwestern Law Review's on-line companion. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 5:39 pm
MIKE RAPPAPORT AND JOHN MCGINNIS WRITE in defense of originalism. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 7:58 am
McGinnis and Michael B. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 7:29 am
McGinnis and Michael B. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 9:03 pm
Introduction There are many different theories of constitutional interpretation, but the most controversial and also perhaps the most influential is "originalism"--actually a loosely-knit family of constitutional theories. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 12:29 pm
McGinnis of Northwestern University School of Law as the moderator. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 8:19 am
If one believes, for example, that the Constitution is binding because it was adopted by representatives of the people under supermajority rules (as John McGinnis and I have argued), one would also be concerned with the method of interpreting the Constitution. [read post]
