Search for: "Mounts v. United States" Results 881 - 900 of 1,099
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2012, 7:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
” The filing did accept (and noted that the State Department, too, had accepted) that a right to sue had been properly recognized by the Second Circuit Court in 1980, in the case of Filartiga v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Court actually has said very little in the nearly fourteen months since its five-to-four decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:42 pm
United States, a case initially brought in state court and removed by the government to federal court, challenging the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm by Kevin LaCroix
While those cases still permeate state and federal courts, large event-driven litigation has become much more common than it was. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
  Unless, of course, everyone likely to mount such a challenge fears bringing the marriage question before the United States Supreme Court, which is where a federal constitutional challenge is likely to end up going. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
An expert from Vermont, which in 2000 became thefirst jurisdiction in the United States to enact a civil union law, testified that civil union couplesthere still face problems with the law today. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 6:36 pm by Stephen Halbrook
Minnesota also relied on the Eighth Circuit's 2023 decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 11:33 am by Alden Abbott
In the United States, this movement has been led by populist “neo-Brandeisians” who have “call[ed] instead for enforcement that takes into account firm size, fairness, labor rights, and the protection of smaller enterprises. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
Clip: Krusty wins the Election “I swear to uphold and protect the Constitution of these United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:02 am by Alyssa Yamamoto
And on the international stage, they have adopted counterterrorism rhetoric to mobilize support or deflect criticism – accusing other States of making statements “in support of terrorism,” urging supporters of the pending ICJ case (South Africa v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
In short, no persuasive arguments have been mounted against the disclosure requirement.The non-disclosure advocates strangely echo the Little Sisters of the Poor (in the Zubik v. [read post]