Search for: "NON-RECORD CLAIMANTS"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,602
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2016, 4:32 pm
Such an action could provide protection against unjustified surveillance, spying, eavesdropping, and recording. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 4:51 am
And why do we allow non-medical professionals to editorialize on medical records? [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:39 pm
The Social Security regulations likewise provide that the claimant can be a dependent natural child, legally adopted child, step child or grandchild. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 8:04 am
Specifically, the court held that, “The Plan ignored favorable evidence submitted by her treating physician(s), selectively reviewed the evidence it did consider from the treating physicians, failed to conduct its own physical examination, and relied on non-treating nurses and other non-treating physicians. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:29 am
There has to be a recognized legal nexus between the natural or adoptive parents of a child and the right of some non-parent to claim custodial rights. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:55 pm
Whether it was Blurred Lines and the protection of the “feel” of a song, The Batmobile being considered a character, Happy Birthday to You losing its copyright claimants, Yoga Poses being ruled non-copyrightable (just like chiropractic procedures) or any of the other dozens of cases in the same vein. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 10:22 am
Our Table of Media Law cases records 87 judgments of the Courts in England and Wales in media law cases in 2015, with 91 having been recorded in 2014. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 7:06 am
In 2004, she was diagnosed with PTSD, which she stated was due to a senior non-commissioned officer (“NCO”) sexually assaulting her while in service, resulting in her pregnancy and the birth of her daughter. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 3:39 am
On its website, the firm touts its “outstanding record” in class actions and group actions. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 8:28 am
The record in the case does not support an as-applied challenge. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 4:03 am
As respondent argued, "There is no record evidence of non-use by Registrant for any period. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 12:01 am
(Public prayer services for non-Catholics had only been legalized the year before.) [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:46 pm
Expert testimony drawing a connection between the condition and a workplace accident has to be based upon other non-medical facts in evidence, such as what happened and the symptoms displayed by the claimant. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 9:03 am
Simpkins also asserts that the distinction between victims of sexual abuse and those tort claimants exempt from the cap violates her right to equal protection of the laws. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 7:53 pm
Maintain good records of job openings, applications, and rejections. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
In the face of incomplete or uninformative file records, unavailable claimants or claimants with little understanding of the process or outcome of their case, telephone interviews were conducted with lawyers who represented the claimants in the original sample. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 5:23 pm
” As one prepares for and awaits hearing, it is important that their attorney is reviewing their case file to determine what records are missing and should be obtained in anticipation of hearing so as to provide the hearing judge with a complete file for their review. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 3:37 pm
The clear position of the Federal Court of Appeal on the need for a copyright claimant to provide timely, reliable and adequate non-hearsay evidence, upholding Justice von Finckenstein’s decision below in this respect, has been eroded because it was neglected by Teksavvy, which took no position, and arguably not fully pursued by CIPPIC, which did not mention it at the hearing. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am
Wholly apart from the fact that the acronym for the petitioner’s name sounds eerily like the single worst cartoon character of all time, that four-time relist concerns a FOIA request for records related to a government grant to Planned Parenthood. [read post]
