Search for: "Nelson v. State" Results 881 - 900 of 1,891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2022, 1:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court has vacated the judgment of this Court and remanded this case to us "for further consideration in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” At the National Council of State Legislatures’ blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Nelson v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on July 12, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on July 12, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 6:15 am by James Romoser
EST in one of the most high-profile cases of the term: Fulton v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 7:35 am by Lyle Denniston
Nelson (09-530) — scope of constitutional right of privacy for personal information Michigan v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 10:57 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Ruby Thomas, No. 98,123 (Geary)Direct appeal (petition for review); PossessionCarl Folsom, IIIFailure to suppress evidenceStatutory speedy trial violationConfrontation Clause (Laturner)State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 4:25 pm
  (The procedural vs. substantive dichotomy traces, of course, to the Supreme Court’s interpretation of its 1938 ruling in Erie Railroad v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:04 pm by Addie Rolnick
My critique is really about state law and seeming approval the Court gave S. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
” Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
For the reasons stated below, we reverse. 07a0245p.06 2007/06/26 USA v. [read post]