Search for: "New Doe Child #1 v. United States" Results 881 - 900 of 1,535
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2008, 11:51 am
US, No. 2007-1220 19 C.F.R. section 181.53, a deferred duty regulation, does not violate the Export Clause, or Article I, Section 9, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:27 pm
Supreme Court - United States - Barack Obama - President - John Roberts [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm by Patricia Hughes
(I’m just finishing the last season of The Americans, about Russians spies in the United States who did incredible imitations of being American, all the time living next door to an FBI agent! [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 11:33 am
” For these reasons, the United States does not believe that DOMA is rationally related to any legitimate government interests in procreation and child-rearing, and is therefore not relying upon any such interests to defend DOMA’s constitutionality. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 11:58 am by Michael Lowe
Criminal defense attorneys across the state welcomed the decision of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (TCCA) this June when the opinion came down in The State Of Texas v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm by INFORRM
United States The creators of the Netflix series “When They See Us” are being sued for defamation. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:47 am by Aaron Pelley
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/289052.opn.doc.pdf Federal Law United States Supreme Court Bond v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm by The Blog Team
Grovo, — F.3d —, 2016 WL 3443691 (9th Cir. 2016) (restitution in child porn cases) In United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 4:14 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Included in the development were a new 7,506 square foot gym, a child care center, and expanded, state-of-the-art space for the Center’s at-risk youth programs. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Finally, recent United States Supreme Court cases Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
United States Docket: 09-342 Issues: (1) What constitutes the proper denominator in the takings fraction under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]