Search for: "New York v. Connecticut" Results 881 - 900 of 1,723
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2013, 4:25 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The Second Circuit’s decision may result in significant consequences for employers operating in New York, Vermont, or Connecticut. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 11:56 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Kris ChellamCase number: 12-cv-7983 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: October 26, 2012Qualifying Judgment/Order: November 5, 2012 12/7/2012 3/7/2013 2012-127 SEC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm by News Desk
Louise Slaughter, MPH Louise Slaughter is Congresswoman for New York’s 25th District. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm by WIMS
EPA also filed a petition, as did a coalition of 15 states and cities (North Carolina, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Baltimore, Bridgeport, Chicago, New York City, Philadelphia, and Washington, D.C.). [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm by WIMS
EPA also filed a petition, as did a coalition of 15 states and cities (North Carolina, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Baltimore, Bridgeport, Chicago, New York City, Philadelphia, and Washington, D.C.). [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:35 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Los estados y territorios que participarán en esta conferencia son: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Carolina del Norte, Carolina del Sur, Colorado, Connecticut, Dakota del Norte, Dakota del Sur, Delaware, Distrito de Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Islas Marianas del Norte, Islas Vírgenes, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska,… [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:09 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case tells us that the employment laws in Connecticut are much more favorable to employees than in New York.The case is McClain v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
There’s nothing it can do about it, since it has no control over the competitor – short of closing its eyes to a potentially breakthrough new use for its product.DDLaw, More Thoughts On Conte v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:56 pm by Nathan Dorn
” (Storing, v. 5, pg. 105) Governments, no matter how they claim to derive their legitimate powers, have a tendency to expand beyond their proper bounds at the expense of the people’s individual rights. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
Against the Church of the Good Shepherd in Binghamton, New York (NY); The Diocese of Central New York v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 6:35 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
"workplace cybertheft" lawsuit: Connecticut court may rule on document download by Toronto employee SCOTUS Justice Sotomayor declines request to block Obamacare contraception coverage The N.R.A.' [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld New York’s restrictive scheme for licensing public carriage of guns in Kachalsky v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 8:36 am by azatty
A hint that the conversation may go farther this time arises in a New York Times story yesterday. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 9:02 am
Here, bank employees in several states including California, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York and Oregon will receive settlement proceeds based as the result of the FLSA lawsuit. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am by Russell Beck
Given the 2nd Circuit’s pronouncement that “irreparable harm [is] the ‘single most important prerequisite for the issuance of a preliminary injunction,’” this decision should have significant implications for noncompete cases in the federal courts in New York, Connecticut, and Vermont. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
Aug. 1, 1995) (the hospital “was a provider of services of which the [products] were an incidental part, rather than a ‘product seller’” under the Connecticut product liability statute).DelawareWe didn’t find any Delaware hospital strict liability cases (probably because Delaware does not recognize strict liability), however, claims for hospital implied warranty have been rejected, for similar sales/service reasons, in Spaeder v. [read post]