Search for: "OLSON v STATE" Results 881 - 900 of 1,178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2010, 9:11 pm
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 9:14 am by Amanda Rice
” In a feature for TIME, Michael Lindenberger interviews David Boies and Ted Olson, who were adversaries in Bush v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:36 pm by Adrian Lurssen
Terry Lenamon's List of State Death Penalty Mitigation Statutes (Full Text)[By: Terence Lenamon |In: Criminal Law]8. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:14 pm by Meg Martin
Summary of Decision issued July 28, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Rivers v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:01 am by Transplanted Lawyer
There are two meaty things to note about the opinion in Perry v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:39 pm by David Lat
The case was famously brought by Ted Olson and David Boies, two of the nation’s top lawyers (who previously faced off in Bush v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 5:59 am by Jon Hyman
Check Your State Law First – from Nolo’s Employment Law Blog Miscellaneous Financial Reform: What Employers Can Expect – from Hunton Employment & Labor Law Perspectives™ Manufacturers’ Hiring Stymied? [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
  Consider also, for example, that Ted Olson’s entire litigation strategy in the anti-Proposition 8 case in California is premised on Olson’s very plausible conviction that Kennedy will vote to invent a federal constitutional right to same-sex marriage. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 6:09 am by Ted Frank
Walter Olson calls our attention to this week's Ninth Circuit decision Antoninetti v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am by Vincent LoTempio
While the Justice Department has had its share of success stories and Walter Olson's blog post at Cato@Liberty lists a few large monetary r [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 10:55 am by Matt Cooper
Representing two same-sex California couples who want to marry, former solicitor general Theodore Olson urged the court to overturn the initiative, likening the case to Brown v. [read post]