Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 881 - 900
of 4,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2021, 2:48 pm
On February 25, 2021, the California Supreme Court decided Donohue v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 6:06 pm
Shaari v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 5:49 pm
On February 25, 2021, the California Supreme Court issued its opinion in Donohue v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 9:14 am
The factual gaps on this issue include: “facts regarding the precise nature of Redbubble’s contractual relationships with third-party manufacturers and shippers”; “the precise degree to which Redbubble is involved in” selecting and imprinting trademark-infringing designs upon its products; “details as to Redbubble’s involvement in the process for returning goods”; “detail[s] on how Redbubble characterizes its own… [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 1:57 pm
FTC v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:11 pm
Many courts had been applying this foreseeability standard based on language from earlier Supreme Court cases like City of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 5:00 am
Sundstrom v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 10:26 am
E.g., Anani v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:02 pm
In § 1983 suits the officer’s actions are judged by a reasonableness standard “not capable of precise definition or mechanical application. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 11:29 am
It would be surprising to see the criminal provisions of the statute have an even lower standard for liability. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am
But let us play out Bowman’s suggestion. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
In the judicial context, there is wide-ranging disagreement about what precisely constitutes a "precedent. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 9:32 am
by Dennis Crouch Saso Golf, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:03 pm
The Medical Secondary Payer Act [M.S.P.] enacted in 1980 permits the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [C.M.S.] to seek reimbursement for medical costs from employers and their insurance companies for work-related injuries. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 10:35 am
The section begins: Even if the principles of First Amendment law are applicable in the impeachment context (and many of us believe they are not), many of us believe there is an extraordinarily strong argument that the Supreme Court's standards, articulated in Brandenburg v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 3:19 pm
In Branti v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
Hellerstedt v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:00 pm
The precise scope of these duties is not strictly tied down to positive law, such as statutes. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
What constitutes effective assistance is not and cannot be fixed with precision, but varies according to the particular circumstances of each case. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
What constitutes effective assistance is not and cannot be fixed with precision, but varies according to the particular circumstances of each case. [read post]
