Search for: "Parcell v. United States"
Results 881 - 900
of 925
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Imagine the president granted a set of pardons to assist a foreign adversary in waging war against the United States. [read post]
24 May 2013, 9:09 am
It is a complaint not about sufficiency, but about process, and stands to be resolved on the basis of the core analysis in Teskey [R. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:26 am
” Plessy v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
United Parcel Serv, Ewalt said. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
The FPA requires entities seeking to operate a dam, reservoir, or hydroelectric power plant in the United States to secure licensure from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”). [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 8:46 am
Save the El Dorado Ditch v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 10:13 am
Supreme Court’s March 25, 2015 decision in Young v United Parcel Serv (98 EPD ¶45,276). [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:30 pm
The Principles of International Law In Part V, the position paper concludes with an ode to the principles underlying international law. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:46 am
In previous precedent, Bell v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 1:08 pm
” City of Troy v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:58 am
This is Tom Goldstein and Justice David Souter in Georgia v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
Filed 3/29/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE JSM TUSCANY, LLC et al., Petitioners, v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The $4 million civil penalty will be divided among the United States, Alabama and Iowa. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The facts involve a relatively small project on 8.2 acres, and the developer’s plan was to consolidate 24 parcels into two lots, with a mixed-use project on 6.23 acres and the balance of 1.98 acres as an open space lot. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The facts involve a relatively small project on 8.2 acres, and the developer’s plan was to consolidate 24 parcels into two lots, with a mixed-use project on 6.23 acres and the balance of 1.98 acres as an open space lot. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 12:46 pm
This didn’t please the FDA, which sent a warning letter to AMARC, stating that since Poly-MVA isn’t FDA-approved, the customer testimonials essentially falsify the product as approved.Here's the letter:HomeInspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal InvestigationsEnforcement ActionsWarning LettersEnforcement ActionsWarning Letters2012-Amarc Enterprises 12/11/12Department of Health and Human ServicesPublic Health ServiceFood and Drug AdministrationLos Angeles… [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:25 pm
at ¶¶ 5-7)On March 25, 2016, WTC removed the action to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The facts involve a relatively small project on 8.2 acres, and the developer’s plan was to consolidate 24 parcels into two lots, with a mixed-use project on 6.23 acres and the balance of 1.98 acres as an open space lot. [read post]
