Search for: "Parker v Parker"
Results 881 - 900
of 2,343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm
A Civil Investigative Demand Issued to You or Your Medical Practice is Serious Business. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:55 pm
However, in the 1954 case Berman v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 9:46 am
" The Supreme Court endorsed this test in Gisbrecht v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 5:53 am
" Gowins v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:04 am
Citing dicta from various Supreme Court decisions, the Second Circuit (Parker, Hall and Matsumoto [D.J.]) notes that the High Court has made passing reference over the years about the legality of this slogan. [read post]
18 Oct 2024, 6:39 am
" The cite for that is Rivera v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:50 am
He sues the police, but he loses the case.The case is MacLeod v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:56 am
” Matusick v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 9:03 pm
Second, they offer the Supreme Court’s 5–4 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:41 pm
Section 1135 Waiver Issues and COVID-19 (March 25, 2020): On January 31, 2020, Secretary Alex Azar, of the US Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), used his authority under the Public Health Service Act to declare a public health emergency in the United States.[1] Secretary Azar determined that a public health emergency had existed nationwide since January 27, 2020. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am
Mellon and Massachusetts v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 3:58 am
The Supreme Court held that Gardner v Parker was wrongly decided. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:39 am
PlaceKay v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:53 am
Parker-Hannifin Corporation decision from June 18, 2007Festo Corporation v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 9:55 am
Plaintiffs' damages theory, which argues for statutory damages of from 2,142 to 428,571 times the actual damages, would lead to an unconstitutional result (Parker v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 3:11 pm
Parker, 249 S.W.3d at 398. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 6:00 am
In Parker v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 9:08 am
Parker issued today in the case captioned United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:04 am
As reported in most of the main news outlets this morning, the Administrative Court, wearing the face of Mr Justice Kenneth Parker, handed down its judgment yesterday in R (on the Application of British Telecommunications Plc & TalkTalk Telecom Group Plc) v The Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2011] EWHC 1021 (Admin), concerning BT and TalkTalk's application for judicial review of the Digital Economy Act 2010. [read post]
