Search for: "Parker v. Parker"
Results 881 - 900
of 2,570
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2018, 7:19 am
Mobile Dentistry in Texas – An Overview of Regulatory Risk Areas to be Considered(December 7, 2018): Each state sets their own licensure requirements, rules and regulations regarding the practice of dentistry, all of which are subject to change. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm
Medicaid After-Hours Claims Audits (CPT Code 99050 / CPT Code 99051) by State Medicaid Regulators are Continuing. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:06 pm
Parker, 2011 U.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 6:09 am
in legal malpractice litigation.Gamiel v Curtis & Riess-Curtis, P.C. ,2007 NY Slip Op 07341 ,Decided on October 4, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department "Plaintiff's affidavit was conclusory (see Murray Hill Invs. v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 305 AD2d 228, 229 [2003]), and failed to set forth the requisite "but for" causation with respect to her legal malpractice claims (see Aquino v Kuczinski,… [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 9:25 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 9:00 am
UPIC Dental Audits / Qlarant Dental Audits Have Been Initiated. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 am
Medicare Exclusion Risks: Employing Excluded Individuals Can Result in Significant Administrative, Civil and / or Criminal Liabilities (May 8, 2023): One of the most severe administrative sanctions available under the Social Security Act stems from the authority of the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)[1] to “exclude” individuals and entities from participating in Federal health care programs.[2] While the… [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 3:07 pm
”[9] V. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:37 am
” V. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 12:53 pm
Estate of Berry v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:03 am
Dougherty, 282 F.3d at 87; see Parker v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 10:25 am
Because the jail was overcrowded, Parker was not booked. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:22 am
State v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 6:19 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:26 am
(“PLAC”) in a case called Parker v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:58 am
Parker, 267 F.3d 839 (U.S. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 12:44 pm
Parker, 139 Wn.2d at 505. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 9:20 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:29 pm
Today, in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 6:04 am
Here is an example: Parker v. 20th Century Fox The studio's conduct was terrible,And the actress's damage repairableOnly with a lead partIn a great work of art:A film that is at least comparable. [read post]
