Search for: "People v Deal"
Results 881 - 900
of 11,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2022, 7:04 am
Markin allegedly learned material nonpublic information by secretly reviewing the binder of deal documents, which he then traded on and tipped to several friends and family members, indirectly causing more than twenty people to trade on the basis of the inside information. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:25 pm
This is, I think, a big deal. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
Suppose that NFIB v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:56 pm
And, as a result, the current litigation climate isn’t so great for corporate officers and directors, the vast majority of whom are decent, hard-working people. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am
In 2008’s Doe v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm
Lots of people were upset. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 2:48 pm
That's the question the United States Supreme Court considered on Monday in the case of Rubin v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 6:14 am
To make matters worse, while the courts typically extend some sympathy to self-represented people (who are called pro se), judges used to dealing with professional attorneys can lose their patience. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:14 pm
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Simms [2000] AC 115, 126E-G. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:24 pm
In the recently published decision, D.Y.F.S. v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 3:26 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Youkers v . [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 7:34 am
Gallagher v Northern Ireland Housing Executive [2009] NICA 50 With the advent of the Land Registration Act 2002 and its new regime for dealing with adverse possession claims these cases are fast disappearing from the Court's of England & Wales. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 7:34 am
Gallagher v Northern Ireland Housing Executive [2009] NICA 50 With the advent of the Land Registration Act 2002 and its new regime for dealing with adverse possession claims these cases are fast disappearing from the Court's of England & Wales. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:31 am
Do recent changes to Schedule 7 powers make Beghal v United Kingdom moot? [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
V. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
Unusually, permission to appeal was granted (by Lewison LJ) on the basis of the “some other compelling reason for the appeal to be heard” limb of CPR 52.6(1), having regard to the novelty of the claim and the procedure for dealing with it, the public interest in data breaches, the number of people affected and the potential sums of money involved. [read post]
13 May 2022, 2:19 pm
Cuomo (2020) and Tandon v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:57 am
bas Klubs v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:58 am
In last week’s case (Savoie v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 10:55 am
In USA v. [read post]
