Search for: "People v Folks" Results 881 - 900 of 2,022
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Justice Ginsburg sits to the Chief Justice's left, a 86 year-old folk hero. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  (In the afternoon I make Pierson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 4:25 am by SHG
And few people are as firm and clear-eyed in their simplicity as Franks. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
 Says this Kat, this sort of service can be just as beneficial to people who are native English-speakers but who -- unlike their foreign counterparts -- have often had little or no chance to learn the rules. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:25 am
It's still possible to get a few more people into the venue, kindly provided by Taylor Wessing LLP which has given us use of its London facilities. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 1:05 pm by Jamie J. Baker, JD, MLIS
  A quick look at the Westlaw version shows that it should be Cocaine – BailFrom November 5, 2018:In the Case People v Kindell, 148 AD3d 456 (1st Dept 2017), Susan Axelrod is listed as both the counsel for the Appellant and the Respondent. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 3:04 pm
Kingsley Egbuonu's return to Africa's official IP websites for Afro-IP takes him back to Mali, while Ron Coleman's Likelihood of Confusion takes us on a trip to a crazy world -- this one -- in which it is possible to contemplate the existence of a brand that its owner doesn't even want people to mention. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 10:42 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Now that people have died, we'll see litigation surrounding this. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 5:16 pm by Karen Gullo
Study after study shows that facial recognition algorithms are not always reliable, and that error rates spike significantly when involving faces of folks of color, especially Black women, as well as trans and nonbinary people. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
Folks are afraid of this judge, and not for good reason. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
So many people have been emailing the IPKat to ask him if he has seen yesterday's General Court decision in Case T-332/10 Viaguara v OHIM - Pfizer (VIAGUARA) that he's beginning to worry if they are trying to tell him something. [read post]