Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
In 1957 Lord Denning, speaking in a debate in the House of Lords on the Wolfenden Report, denounced homosexual acts as “unnatural vice” which “strikes at the integrity of the human race. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/l2MXeuR5q1 -> Newbury v Sun Microsystems Ltd – when is a settlement offer binding? [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
“Hmm”, mused Merpel, “the lengths which some people will go to in order to secure the referee of their choice never ceases to amaze. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 5:20 am
The 10 most popular posts of the past month are as follows (in descending order of popularity) Social Media: How many people use Twitter and what do we think about it? [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 8:07 am
In Minersville School District v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:20 am
He commented on the court’s commitment to quality, and the fact that a number of cases heard by the UKSC over the past year have been of considerable public interest (referring in particular to R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another, Local Government Byelaws (Wales) Bill 2012 – Reference by the Attorney General and Bank Mellat v HM Treasury). [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 7:37 am
Proposing the “no endorsement” test in Lynch v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:07 pm
On 1 October 2013 there is an application in in the case of Subotic v Knezevic On 4 October 2013 there is an application in Bewry v Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Next week in Parliament The House of Commons and the House of Lords are in recess and will next sit on Tuesday [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:15 pm
The Court of Appeal cite with approval what was said in Strasbourg in YC v United Kingdom (2012) 55 EHRR 967, para 134: ‘Family ties may only be severed in very exceptional circumstances and .. everything must be done to preserve personal relations and, where appropriate, to ‘rebuild’ the family. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
In patent academic circles, this has sometimes been referred to as the “Angora Cat” approach as noted by Lord Justice Jacob in European Central Bank v Document Security Systems Inc, [2008] EWCA Civ 192, where he said, at paragraph 5 of the report: Professor Mario Franzosi likens a patentee to an Angora cat. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
Two differently constituted Courts of Appeal for England and Wales, within a very short period, appear to have come up with quite different approaches to how to treat an appeal in which they take issue with the trial judge's findings of fact, one case being Lumos and the other being Okotoks v Fine & Country (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:33 am
The case was heard on 27 June 2013 by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Wilson and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
O’Connor, Francis V., ed. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:20 am
Lord Neuberger hosted a reception for this charity at the Royal Courts of Justice back in January. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 2:37 pm
The notion that joint or common owners of property cannot be charged with larceny is firmly rooted in common law as held in People v Zinke. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
Because they have no sharp edges, it is a case in which, in Lord Nicholls’ words, “the position is not so clear”; but not one where Article 14 does not apply at all. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
Because they have no sharp edges, it is a case in which, in Lord Nicholls’ words, “the position is not so clear”; but not one where Article 14 does not apply at all. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
Because they have no sharp edges, it is a case in which, in Lord Nicholls’ words, “the position is not so clear”; but not one where Article 14 does not apply at all. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 6:34 am
., in US v. [read post]
