Search for: "People v Paine" Results 881 - 900 of 3,323
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2021, 2:00 pm by Vanessa L. Williams
It is painful to see my island’s distinction among the U.S. is yet again based on the denial of a fundamental right to our women. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
And can we effectively compare the magnitude of this sort of pain across people and procedures? [read post]
29 May 2015, 10:17 am by Guest Blogger
  Pear’s piece has provoked an ongoing avalanche of fervid reactions from both friends and foes of the King v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 5:30 am by Sherry F. Colb
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
It is not difficult to guess what part of the second paragraph of the opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 4:05 am by SHG
Georgia, and states could no longer put people to death, until the Supremes changed their mind in Gregg v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 1:39 pm by Harold O'Grady
On April 21, 1896, the Court of Appeals of New York in People v Barberi, 149 N.Y. 256 (available on Westlaw Next at this link) ruled that the judgment of conviction should be reversed and a new trial granted. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:27 am by Daniel Sokol
For many people, a life in MCS is a more terrifying prospect than a purely vegetative existence. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 8:01 am by Joe Consumer
" Seems like a no-brainer, but unfortunately in 2004, when the court was the most consumer unfriendly, anti-environment, anti-victim, precedent-disregarding court in the land, it ruled in the Kreiner v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 8:01 am by Joe Consumer
" Seems like a no-brainer, but unfortunately in 2004, when the court was the most consumer unfriendly, anti-environment, anti-victim, precedent-disregarding court in the land, it ruled in the Kreiner v. [read post]