Search for: "People v. Germany"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,216
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2022, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization symposium on Susan Rose-Ackerman, Democracy and Executive Power: Policymaking Accountability in the US, the UK, Germany, and France (Yale University Press, 2021). [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 10:39 am
Approximately 2,000 people are hospitalized, and 60 people die as a direct result of E. coli O157:H7 infections and complications. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
They raise the price, eliminate competition, cut people out, transfer consumer surplus to themselves—but they are also giving something to people who canafford the chair: a chair with more narrative and thus more market value. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
This was also the year of the rise of the core of leadership--in Turkey, Russia, China, the United States, Germany, and France. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Sarah Burstein: Reichman is worried that designs can’t satisfy nonobviousness—but the Federal Circuit has removed constraints.Reichman: the Fed Cir has improved it; but still, nonobviousness means that people don’t apply—the lawyers tell the designer there’s no chance. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 4:29 am
European Command (Eucom) headquarters in Stuttgart, Germany, and at Special Operations Command headquarters in Tampa, FL. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Fix your mistakesJackson v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:52 am
Apple v Samsung v Apple v Samsung v Apple....Last year the AmeriKat was constantly up-to-date reporting on the latest of the patent mobile phone wars. [read post]
8 May 2021, 4:50 am
S v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 6:03 am
See Yelling v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:28 am
People will pay if they have enough money. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:37 pm
ESA v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:59 am
This falls apart in other situations, such as Fox v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:50 am
Most people would agree that reading lengthy judgments, or overly-complicated scholarly papers, can be as helpful as counting sheep to drift off. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 11:51 am
I, too, have faced shitstorms because of pro-copyright positions I took in connection with Oracle v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
Court of First Instance rejects Lego’s appeal against OHIM’s Board of Appeals decision that Lego brick shape not registrable as a Community trade mark (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) OHIM opposition quality standards – the Office responds (IPKat) Charlie McCreevy puts forward proposal to reduce CTM fees by about 40% (Managing Intellectual Property) (Class 46) New protected geographical indications: French PGI Boeuf de Bazas for fresh meat and offal; Finnish PGI Kainuun… [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Earlier, in 2013, the Federal Court of Germany held Google to be liable for violating a plaintiff’s personality rights and reputation for associating his name with ‘fraud’ and ‘Scientology’ in an Autocomplete search (this case is hereinafter referred to as RS v Google). [read post]
