Search for: "People v. Holder"
Results 881 - 900
of 2,871
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2022, 1:28 am
This writer is woefully behind the times in writing about this decision, but it does merit belated discussion and is a very important decision to keep in mind in relation to intermediaries.The case of Frank Peterson v Google LLC (along with another case; Elsevier v Cyando) concerns Nemo Studio, a company owned by Mr Peterson who is a music producer. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:27 pm
(Cardoso v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:27 pm
(Cardoso v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:20 pm
The earlier article by v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 12:20 pm
Then Buffy v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:27 am
Maloney v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 9:37 am
Burkle
Subscription Required
NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal Practice
Allegations Defendant Engaged in Unauthorized Practice of Profession, Prostitution Sufficient
People v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 1:44 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKContracts
Pact Expressly Released Insurer of Liability For $2 Million Escrow Fund Holder's Actions
Clean Earth Remediation and Constr'n Svces Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:03 am
As with Instagram, Twitter allows users to `share photos, in real time, with everyone or with the people [they] choose. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 8:21 am
Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 12:10 pm
We have a right to pray for people. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:38 am
Vernor v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
For present purposes, however, the important point to understand is that Trump’s primary merits argument, to which he devotes the first 13 pages of the Argument section of his brief (pp. 20-33), concerns only the second, middle “Officials Clause,” which identifies the current and former office-holders to whom Section 3 potentially applies, rather than the government positions that an insurrectionist or rebel is ineligible to occupy going forward. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 8:30 am
The program takes place in a studio (and in location: street, shopping mall or unexpected at people's homes). [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:46 pm
Macklin v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:06 am
In 2010, he was the lead attorney for the plaintiffs in Lewis v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 8:30 am
Changes to it can only change through the procedures laid out in Article V. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm
Only one unreversed Supreme Court majority opinion has upheld a content-based speech restriction on strict scrutiny grounds — last year’s Holder v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
On February 13, 2018, in Forman v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Biggest takeaway: the federal judiciary has been comprehensively reshaped over the past 4 years by people who were not hired for their opinions on IP. [read post]
