Search for: "People v. Lee" Results 881 - 900 of 1,751
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2013, 2:03 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Reasoning by analogy to the court’s decision in People v LeGrand, which dealt with expert testimony on eyewitness identification, defense counsel argued that the judge should at a minimum hold a Frye hearing on the admissibility of Dr. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:35 pm by Mark Tushnet
The most recent prominent example of which I'm aware is Justice Kennedy's opinion in Lee v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
Human Rights, Subjectivity and the Potential of Narrative Maggie Werner, Hobart & William: Heroes v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
Human Rights, Subjectivity and the Potential of Narrative Maggie Werner, Hobart & William: Heroes v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 9:09 am by ngarnett
   For more on this argument, see this interesting article on city v. suburban fortunes in the current recession. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 8:26 am
The Maryland Court of Appeals overturned the Maryland Court of Special Appeals in a 4-3 decision in Goldberg v. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 8:26 am
The Maryland Court of Appeals overturned the Maryland Court of Special Appeals in a 4-3 decision in Goldberg v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 2:05 pm by Richard Hornsby
So here I was watching Saturday Night Live (Google v. iPhone) when I noticed this post on the MarinadeDave blog: ALERT! [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:43 pm by Big Tent Democrat
Lee Optical Co., 348 U.S., at 489 -490. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 12:33 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
See Kam Lee Yuen Trading Co. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:55 pm by Florian Mueller
Some people in Cupertino should listen to the official recording (MP3) of yesterday's Federal Circuit hearing on the cross-appeal relating to the second California Apple v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
Lee (Kenyon & Kenyon) noted that both brand-name pharmaceutical companies and generics want reverse payments to continue. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am by INFORRM
The Minority Thought blog has a piece under the title “Should we really have to force newspapers to stop smearing innocent people” dealing with the suggestion that Parliament might be asked to ban the media from identifying people arrested by police in criminal investigations until after they have been charged. [read post]