Search for: "People v. More"
Results 881 - 900
of 48,727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2010, 4:41 am
People v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 12:17 pm
" Tacking on two more years to his sentence.The Court of Appeal concludes that's okay. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 9:59 pm
I've got more thoughts here, but it's time for a faculty meeting. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:34 am
On 17 to 19 January 2012, the Supreme Court heard an appeal in the case of Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes . [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Protecting People from Their Own Religious Communities: Jane Doe in Church and State
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Decker v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 5:21 am
People v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
" -- People v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 4:11 am
In Williams v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:21 am
Adler v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor, she wrote: “More effectively every day, that practice enables politicians to entrench themselves in power against the people’s will. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 9:00 am
This was the issue in Burgueno v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
”).[4] And official deception is even more problematic than mere secrecy. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 8:51 am
Jones: “I would ask whether people reasonably expect that their movements will be recorded and aggregated in a manner that enables [one] to ascertain, more or less at will, their political and religious beliefs, sexual habits, and so on. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 9:43 am
Colvin, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, June 29, 2016 More Blog Entries: Stacy v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:18 pm
You can charge older people more for goods and services than young people because the former have more money than the latter.So holds the Court of Appeal.I'm sure that the fancy-schmancy "luxury health" fitness club in the Bay Area here decided to charge 18 to 29 year-olds a (much) lower monthly fee than its older patrons because they were concerned that single people in their 20s in the Bay Area had much lower disposable income than their… [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:02 am
I’ve taken a day to chew over the Supreme Court’s decision in Chiafalo v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 10:59 am
In San Francisco v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 10:27 am
She again admits everything, was sentenced to (and served) some more jail time, and probation was continued on some harsher conditions.Another year passes, and again she gets violated when she admits that she's relapsed into drugs. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:25 pm
The Court of Appeal doesn't mention anything about this exchange, but I'd have dropped a footnote that said we expect a little more circumspection, neutrality and restraint from our judges. [read post]
