Search for: "People v. Peters"
Results 881 - 900
of 2,117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2019, 8:32 am
That might also be true when there are only 3 elements, but it’s more likely w/1000.Peter Golder, Aaron Yeater, & Mike Schreck, Dartmouth College, Analysis Group, & Analysis Group, Assessing Trademark Strength without SurveysSecondary meaning: in search of a more rigorous way to deal with the qualitative aspects of an inquiry. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
: (Patenting Lives), Worldwide increase in patent filings puts strain on system: (Managing Intellectual Property), WIPO releases 2008 Worldwide Patent Report: (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Patent Prospector), (IP Updates), Global patent filings continue rise but may level off; smaller nationals slipping: (Intellectual Property Watch), Means plus function: Don’t ignore the man behind the curtain: (Intellectual Property Directions), Technology start-up entrepreneurs and… [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
Shure, Inc (GRAY on Claims) (Patently-O) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC on relative claim terminology: Power-One, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC: Panel disagrees regarding use of incorporation by reference to identify structure for means-plus-function claims: Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 3:56 pm
Pero, según cuenta Peter Irons, cometió “un error de estudiante de primer año”. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 12:28 pm
Mellow Beverage Co., LLC v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 8:59 pm
Wahl Shoe Company, Inc., (1994) 22 Cal. 4th 397, citing People v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:59 am
user accounts and websites were traced to people other than the Chisms. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 11:34 am
First, the facts: Leesa Jacobson and Peter Ragan -- as part of a group called People Helping People -- want to protest near a near-border immigration checkpoint, and to monitor what happens at the checkpoint (including by videorecording it). [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:07 am
Most people think of an “investigation” as being targeted in some way—looking for the culprit in a specific crime and focusing on a particular person or group of people police have reason to think might be involved in criminal activity. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 7:18 am
In the lead-up to oral arguments in Al-Alwi v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 5:18 am
In State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 2:01 pm
The preview case allows readers to argue Brown v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 7:04 pm
Specifically, in February 2007, in the San Manuel Indian v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 6:21 am
When Good People Do Bad Things by Peter J. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:11 am
The driving force is Peter Unger's work about poverty and our responsibility to alleviate it. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:17 am
From Blankenship v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:30 am
So begins the opinion in last week's Primiano v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 12:26 am
A case is not just for the individual, it also has a precedent and so it can affect hundreds of homeless people. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:30 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 11:27 pm
Quick links Peter Frost, Chris Jones and Josh Peters, Lexology: UK: EAT provides welcome guidance on proportionality in belief/freedom of expression cases: on Higgs v Farmor’s School. [read post]