Search for: "Perry v. United States"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,125
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2010, 8:35 pm
By Mike Dorf In my latest FindLaw column and my post on Monday, I took issue with the framing of the relevance of Romer v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 2:47 pm
Supreme Court case, Ridgway v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:15 pm
Cone Memorial Hospital, 460 U.S. 1 (1983); Perry v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:19 pm
And also this week, David Boies and Ted Olson did a phenomenal job of in the Ninth Circuit panel’s hearing on the appeal of Perry v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:13 am
” Assistant to the Solicitor General Curtis Gannon argued on behalf of the United States as an amicus supporting First Derivative. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:57 pm
Industries brought this putative class action claiming that in January and February of 2010, Wells Fargo and United States Pan Asian American Chamber of Commerce and United States Pan Asian American Chamber of Commerce Education Foundation ("USPAACC") sent four USPAACC-EF/Wells Fargo Asian Business Leadership Award applications. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 7:22 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit heard oral arguments in Perry v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:53 am
United States, in which the Court also heard oral argument yesterday. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 12:38 pm
This is a federal death penalty case, so any request for clemency -- a commutation of the death sentence to a life sentence -- would be directed to the President of the United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:20 am
Office of Personnel Management and Perry v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 8:22 am
For fans of baseball, the appeal of Perry v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:03 pm
Perry v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:18 am
”) (emphasis added); United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 8:23 pm
Lyle has diligently tracked the progress of the challenge to California’s “Proposition 8” law, Perry v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:01 pm
United States) harkened back to Chief Justice Marshall's approach in Marbury v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
At Dorf on Law, Mike Dorf considers the potential implications of the order in which three gay rights cases, Perry v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:18 pm
United States invalidated Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell (DADT). [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
Gonzalez, Chief Judge of the United States District Court, Southern District of California, in granting a plaintiff’s motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, stopped Washington Mutual or “WaMu” from foreclosing on the plaintiff’s home. [read post]
