Search for: "Price v. Superior Court" Results 881 - 900 of 1,086
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2009, 12:22 pm
When those conditions are satisfied, NYNEX's holding (which is consistent with much of the Supreme Court's general jurisprudence about the monopolist's freedom to optimal pricing, e.g., Trinko, Linkline) that deceptive or fraudulent conduct that merely results in higher prices but not exclusion cannot be the basis of a Section 2 claim. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
 The court found no relation between the suggested retail price of the products and the damages sought and remanded the suit to state court.NO CONTROVERSY BECAUSE NO CAFA “Dusty Bottoms: Time for plan B. [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:16 am by Broc Romanek
The Court found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success on their claim that Section 5.2(a)(v) of the merger agreement was an unreasonable defensive measure. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:44 pm by Thomas Surmanski
In 2016, Jordan set stricter boundaries and presumptive ceilings – namely 18 months in provincial courts from charge to the end of trial and 30 months for Superior Court (or cases tried in provincial courts after a preliminary inquiry). [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:44 pm by Thomas Surmanski
In 2016, Jordan set stricter boundaries and presumptive ceilings – namely 18 months in provincial courts from charge to the end of trial and 30 months for Superior Court (or cases tried in provincial courts after a preliminary inquiry). [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Pritchard suggested that corporate shareholders propose a fix for what he considers flaws in the Supreme Court's Basic v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Superior Court, which the California Supreme Court decided in 1998. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 12:07 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released a decision in Eisenberg v. [read post]
LITIGATION Two More Vanilla Cases Get Thrown Out of the Food Court In Robie v. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 9:07 am by Russell Knight
The value of a publicly listed company can be determined at any given moment based on the traded price of the stock. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
Lawyers for MGN told the court the company has “paid a very heavy price” for the hacking scandal, while advocates for Prince Harry argued he was entitled to £320,000 in aggravated damages. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 4:39 pm by Greg May
The California Supreme Court reached a sensible decision in Silverbrand v. [read post]