Search for: "Price v. Superior Court"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,085
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
More to the point, as the Supreme Court clarified in KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:42 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
The court found no relation between the suggested retail price of the products and the damages sought and remanded the suit to state court.NO CONTROVERSY BECAUSE NO CAFA “Dusty Bottoms: Time for plan B. [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:16 am
The Court found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success on their claim that Section 5.2(a)(v) of the merger agreement was an unreasonable defensive measure. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:44 pm
In 2016, Jordan set stricter boundaries and presumptive ceilings – namely 18 months in provincial courts from charge to the end of trial and 30 months for Superior Court (or cases tried in provincial courts after a preliminary inquiry). [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:44 pm
In 2016, Jordan set stricter boundaries and presumptive ceilings – namely 18 months in provincial courts from charge to the end of trial and 30 months for Superior Court (or cases tried in provincial courts after a preliminary inquiry). [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Pritchard suggested that corporate shareholders propose a fix for what he considers flaws in the Supreme Court's Basic v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 10:49 am
See Fox v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 1:26 pm
Hydro-Blok USA LLC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
Superior Court, which the California Supreme Court decided in 1998. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 12:07 pm
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released a decision in Eisenberg v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:27 pm
Dyson, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:58 am
Mazza v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 11:27 am
LITIGATION Two More Vanilla Cases Get Thrown Out of the Food Court In Robie v. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 9:07 am
The value of a publicly listed company can be determined at any given moment based on the traded price of the stock. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
Lawyers for MGN told the court the company has “paid a very heavy price” for the hacking scandal, while advocates for Prince Harry argued he was entitled to £320,000 in aggravated damages. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 4:39 pm
The California Supreme Court reached a sensible decision in Silverbrand v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 11:22 am
Supreme Court held in Twombly v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 12:07 pm
In yesterday's post on Google's opening brief in the appeal of Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
