Search for: "ROSS v. STATE"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,602
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2008, 4:19 pm
Rev. 1372 (2008) [PDF] Ross C. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
In Rucho v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 9:58 am
Eminent Domain Use and Abuse: Kelo in Context (ABA 2007) (Dwight Merriam, Mary Massaron Ross, eds.) [read post]
5 May 2011, 3:15 am
" "Since the court's findings and conclusions are supported by the record, we find that the judgment provided the parties with substantial justice according to the rules and principles of substantive law (CCA 1804, 1807; Ross v Friedman, 269 AD2d 584 [2000]; Williams, 269 AD2d at 126). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
" "Since the court's findings and conclusions are supported by the record, we find that the judgment provided the parties with substantial justice according to the rules and principles of substantive law (CCA 1804, 1807; Ross v Friedman, 269 AD2d 584 [2000]; Williams, 269 AD2d at 126). [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 3:18 pm
LeviThe California Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in Ross v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 10:09 am
In Michigan Deferred Presentment Services Association, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 11:45 pm
International Society for Krishna Consciousness, (Encyclopedia of the United States Supreme Court, 2008).Shelley Ross Saxer, Faith in Action: Religious Accessory Uses and Land Use Regulation, (Utah Law Review, Forthcoming).Nathan B. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:59 pm
The case is Rent-a-Car v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 2:52 pm
Sager (5 Cal.3d 153), Bernhard v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 2:52 pm
Sager (5 Cal.3d 153), Bernhard v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 5:24 am
Notable Events of the Week: “President Trump stood next to President Vladimir V. [read post]
25 Nov 2022, 12:30 pm
And in more amicus brief news, IJ is asking an Indiana state trial court put a stop to a troubling new trend: the state—acting through a private prosecutor—conducting civil forfeitures in virtual secrecy by redacting basic information (including the names of the defendants, descriptions of the property being forfeited, and nearly all of the probable-cause affidavit required by state law) on court documents. [read post]
24 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm
" Dissent: Whatever the Fifth said, there's two meanings of "necessary," and this ain't the one from McCulloch v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 5:08 pm
Delia was employment-law-ish enough to make Ross Runkel's Employment Law Memo. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 12:30 pm
Next Friday, January 21st, the Supreme Court will consider whether to take up that question in the case of Pollreis v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:09 am
” In Beckles v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 9:27 am
This is also consistent with the California Supreme Court’s holding in Ross v. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
We affirmed their convictions in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 10:26 am
Below is a New York Times Piece about Bayou v. [read post]
