Search for: "ROWE v. STATE" Results 881 - 900 of 3,522
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2017, 3:52 pm by Amy Howe
For the ninth conference in a row, the justices did not act on the petition for review in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 4:22 am by Eugene Volokh
But last week, following a 15-month legal battle with procedural twists and turns that almost rival Jarndyce v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:38 am by Joy Waltemath
Finally, the court explained that employers are not forbidden from allowing employees who are aware of their entitlement to choose not to take a day of rest (Mendoza v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:52 pm by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
Today, the California Supreme Court answered three questions related to seventh day of work rules (Mendoza v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At BuzzFeed News, Chris Geidner reports on the court’s decision this week to send Alabama death-row inmate Taurus Carroll’s case back to the state court “’for further review in light of Moore v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 10:55 am by Robin Frazer Clark
 Some states have even placed a temporary halt on executions for inmates on death row until the McWilliams opinion is delivered. [read post]
4 May 2017, 10:55 am by Robin Frazer Clark
 Some states have even placed a temporary halt on executions for inmates on death row until the McWilliams opinion is delivered. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
EJI notes that yesterday’s order list also included an order sending back Alabama death-row inmate Taurus Carroll’s case to the state court “for further review in light of the Court’s recent decision in Moore v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 1:36 pm by Amy Howe
The post Argument analysis: Nine justices, with five votes for death row inmate? [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 9:47 am by Amy Howe
For the second week in a row, the Supreme Court did not add any new cases to its merits docket for next term. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
The first is McWilliams v. [read post]