Search for: "Return to Freedom" Results 881 - 900 of 7,760
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2012, 12:15 pm by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
The recent changes to the combat exclusion policy are steps in the right direction, but the women who are risking their lives to protect our freedoms deserve more. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 5:31 am by Anoush Baghdassarian
Armenia further contends that the “blockade” of the Lachin Corridor violates the freedom of movement implied in the right to leave any country, including one’s own, and the right to return to one’s country. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:15 am by Guest Author Gary Shapiro
As a nation, we have always returned to the fundamental principle that we will flourish most when everyone is most free to speak. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:23 am by Legal Beagle
” Asked if Ms Logan was expected to return to her post as Chief Executive, the insider said he had no information either way. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:37 am by Alfred Brophy
I have some exciting news: after nine years on the UNC faculty I'm returning to the University of Alabama, where I will hold the Paul and Charlene Jones Chair. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 2:20 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
EACH DISCLOSURE IS A SUBSEQUENT ILLEGAL ACT and is not protected, even in a Presidential campaign, by the broad constitutional freedoms allowed for “political speech” and even more so by a U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:14 am
With that, we cheer her freedom. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Once wrongful removal is shown, return of the child is "required" unless the respondent establishes one of four defenses: 1) The proceeding was commenced in the responding state more than one year after the wrongful removal or retention, and "the child is now settled in its new environment" (Article 12); 2) The party now seeking return of the child was not actually exercising custodial rights at the time of the wrongful removal or retention of the child; or… [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Understanding When Science and Religion Intersect In Canada, each citizen is afforded freedom on a number of fronts, including freedom to practice the religion of their choosing, in any manner a person deems fit, so long as no laws are broken. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Understanding When Science and Religion Intersect In Canada, each citizen is afforded freedom on a number of fronts, including freedom to practice the religion of their choosing, in any manner a person deems fit, so long as no laws are broken. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 9:25 am by JURIST Staff
However, their exhaustion and desire for less restrictions should not be conflated with a general acceptance to immediately ‘return to (pre-COVID-19) normal’ and ‘end all COVID-19 mandates’ under the guise of ‘untrammelled freedom,’ which disregards many important public health protections, especially those designed to protect and enable the health and freedom of the most vulnerable in our communities. [read post]
12 May 2016, 2:08 pm by Pamela Wolf
In the interest of fairness … From the employee perspective, however, “workforce freedom” and “right-to-work” laws may look a little different. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:27 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Since Congress first passed FISA in 1978, it has returned to the statute on any number of occasions to tinker with it in response to changed circumstances and shifting technologies. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 10:32 am
(4) Now return to the main page of baidu.com, and search for "Falun Gong". [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 7:55 am by Ryan M. Holmes
On Wednesday, December 1, 2010, the Illinois Senate passed the Illinois Religious Freedom Protection and Civil Union Act, which, when signed by the Governor, will become effective June 1, 2011. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 4:00 am by Christopher Slobogin
Simon Chesterman, One Nation Under Surveillance:  A New Social Contract to Defend Freedom Without Sacrificing Liberty (Oxford University Press, 2011). [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 2:45 am by David Smith
However, Brian Haw, the original protester really having been there since some point in 2002, and Barbara Tucker, resident since late 2005, along with one other person were not removed from the site pending a review of the proportionality of removing them from the site as against their rights under Articles 10 and 11 of European Convention on Human Rights (the rights to freedom of expression and freedom of assembly respectively). [read post]