Search for: "S. T. "
Results 881 - 900
of 743,038
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2018, 7:49 am
T. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Shuts Down Gay Professor’s Talk About Taking the ‘T’ Out of LGBT first appeared on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
[… T]he Board does not consider it necessary to reach a conclusion on the admissibility of this opposition. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
telephone consultation on October 13, 2010, wherein the Examiner insisted on the necessity to delete claims 2 to 4 in view of the amendment of claim 1.On May 16, 2011, the Examiner called the applicant’s representative and informed him that the case was essentially suitable for issue of an intention to grant subject to deletion of claims 2 to 4. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:46 am
I have no knowledge as to why the firm fired this associate, but if it’s because of her complaint to HR about the partner’s allegedly racist email, it would be unlawful retaliation. 2./ Just because something isn’t “illegal” doesn’t make it right. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:00 am
In a comment to a recent post, a commentator mentioned the Examiner’s fear that applicants may not show at oral proceedings (OPs). [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 9:53 am
That’s bad news for American consumers. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 6:41 pm
Gupta, why doesn't the government bring criminal charges? [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 1:30 pm
Gov’t in Trademarking “Space Force” appeared first on Pasha Law PC. [read post]
28 May 2012, 5:01 pm
According to other decisions (T 314/99 [5.1 to 5.6]) or T 186/01 [4]), a document did not become publicly available by its mere arrival in the archive of a library. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
If the Board followed the representative’s argument, then the representative himself would be in control of determining the date of removal of the cause of non-compliance. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
R 22 which is applicable during opposition proceedings according to R 85).[6] In the absence of any response from the appellant’s representative to its communication of 20 June 2012, the board concludes that the original appellant has lost its capacity to act in proceedings before the EPO. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
T 142/97 [2.2]), the main legal basis for refusing the admission of evidence are the provisions dealing with the late filing of evidence (A 114(2) EPC, A 12(4) and 13 RPBA). [read post]
22 May 2011, 6:38 pm
Attorney Matthew T. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 3:30 pm
“Jumbo’s pitiful refusal to leave London Zoo tugged at the nation’s heartstrings”, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons T 116/18 – 3.3.02’s interpretation of G 2/21 To briefly recap, the relevant test in G2/21 is: A patent applicant or proprietor may rely upon a technical effect for inventive step if the skilled person, having the common general knowledge in mind, and based on the application as originally filed, would… [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 2:03 pm
Brown (Cohen Milstein) discusses how DOJ's Attempt to Block the AT&T/T-Mobile Merger Places the Horizontal Merger Guidelines on Trial. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 7:59 am
Business leaders are feeling unloved, but giving them a group hug won't cure what ails the economy, The New York Times's Paul Krugman writes in his latest column. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 1:05 pm
Joyel T. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
The circumstances of the case in decision T 1210/05 are therefore different from, and not comparable with those of the present case.The [patent proprietor] has also made reference to the comments of decision T 1210/05 [2.5.8] relating to the capacity of a witness to recollect past events. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 5:22 am
The subsequent decision to refuse was appealed.In the Board's opinion, the filed statement of grounds did not explain why the Examining Division's Art. 56 objection was incorrect. [read post]
