Search for: "S.A. V. STATE" Results 881 - 900 of 1,411
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2011, 10:14 am by Thomas Carbonneau
  It echoes the rationale of Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:51 am by gmlevine
A respondent has a right to a “domain name [that] reflects [his] initials [and his] … first and middle name, combined with [his] entire last name,” Modefine S.A. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:00 am by John Elwood
 But the Court acknowledged in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 5:37 am by David Canton
In the recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision, Tucows.Com Co v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:17 am by Marie Louise
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) Solvay – Damages expert opinion based on ‘50% profit sharing rule’ was not unreliable: Solvay S.A. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 7:29 am by Larry Ribstein
N.Y. 2006), applying Delaware law, and two recent NY Court of Appeals cases: Centro Empresarial Cempresa S.A. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:29 am by Jill Gross
Second, the Court’s singular distrust of class arbitration is palpable throughout the opinion, a distrust that also appeared in the Court’s 2010 decision in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:53 pm by Hiro Aragaki
  The false hope of discovering arbitration’s true nature led it to embark on this unfortunate path a year earlier, in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:57 am by Cliff Palefsky
It is interesting to compare the Court’s concern with the newly required “knowing” consent to class arbitration in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:58 am
 In SunTrust's case, the defendants had to decide that point before the Supreme Court's three recent-- and significant-- arbitration opinions: Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]