Search for: "SECTION 13 OFFICER"
Results 881 - 900
of 7,753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2011, 10:23 am
Koukios of the Criminal Division's Fraud Section, with the assistance of the U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:58 pm
Thirdly, the UK Intellectual Property Office was correct to find that the applications were deemed withdrawn under s.13, because if all that is needed from the applicant under s.13 is honest but ill-founded belief in his right to grant, this would render s.7 useless ([25]). [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 10:43 am
It was to the size and nature of this undertaking, among other things, that the Hearing Officer was required by section 40 to have regard in assessing the nature of the benefit. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 7:06 am
These dynamics likely increase the cost, complexity, and delay associated with litigating Section 1983 cases. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 9:50 am
Shrader, July 13, 2017, Jacobs, D.).Compensation claims. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 5:24 am
You can now access "Bills To Be Considered on the House Floor" - a new digital repository from the Office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
Please feel free to contact him directly at mcnabb@mcnabbassociates.com or at one of the offices listed above. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 2:45 pm
Office of Public and Indian Housing (jurisdiction, Department of Housing and Urban Development program)* State Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmCases featured: Christopher C. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 12:05 pm
If the claim does not recite subject matter that falls under one of the four statutory categories, than the analysis terminates with a rejection pursuant to section 101. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
Approved by House and Senate 5/13/11. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:36 am
City and County of San Francisco (13 Cal.App.5th 1), which was published on June 27, 2017, the Court of Appeal reiterated that officers are entitled to an administrative appeal of punitive action and determined that the City had not provided such an appeal. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 8:38 am
NOTHING IN THIS BANKRUPTCY BLOG CONSTITUTES LEGAL ADVICE RE A CHAPTER 7, CHAPTER 13, CHAPTER 11, OR CHAPTER 12. [read post]
13 May 2007, 6:07 pm
LVRJ 5/13/07 Replacement assigned for Halverson. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:49 pm
Establishing effective policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with Section 13(a) and Regulation FD may, in addition to reducing the risk of violations, have the effect of reducing the risk of liability in the event a violation occurs. [read post]
31 May 2021, 1:05 am
However, section 19.2 does not apply to section 19.4. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:10 am
If the Section 8 Affidavit and Section 9 Renewal are not timely filed, the registration will be cancelled. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:10 am
If the Section 8 Affidavit and Section 9 Renewal are not timely filed, the registration will be cancelled. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:01 am
Appellant "couldn't explain why he was chatting with a 13-year old." [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 1:36 am
Bortnick (pictured left) concerning the directors’ and officers’ liability issues related to cyber security and data breaches. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
It is not enough for Section 1983 plaintiffs to show that what the officer did was very similar to what an officer did in an earlier case in which liability was imposed and upheld by the court. [read post]
