Search for: "STATE TAX COURTS JUDICIAL"
Results 881 - 900
of 5,076
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
Paragraph 1 of the new Article 7 permits the Requesting State to use evidence or information it has obtained from the requested State for its criminal investigations and proceedings, for preventing an immediate and serious threat to its public security, for non-criminal judicial or administrative proceedings directly related to its criminal investigations or proceedings, for non-criminal judicial or administrative proceedings for which assistance was provided… [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:44 pm
Filed by 20 state attorneys general, the suit claims that Congress's decision to zero out the tax penalty owed by those who fail to obtain qualifying helath insurance requires courts to invalidate the entire ACA. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 10:20 am
The Supreme Judicial Court also rejected the argument that attorney’s fees are encompassed by the policy provision extending coverage to “[a]ll costs taxed against the insured in the ‘suit. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 12:28 pm
The Drug Court Program provides frequent judicial contact – review hearings – for each participant. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 12:28 pm
The Drug Court Program provides frequent judicial contact – review hearings – for each participant. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 8:49 pm
But that is very different from ruling that it already is a tax, or could be reinterpreted as such by judges (as Chief Justice Roberts ultimately did when the issue got to the Supreme Court). [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 4:06 am
Consequently while a federal court may grant prospective injunctive relief against a state officer to compel compliance with federal law, a state court cannot compel a state officer to comply with state law.The Supreme Court reasoned that the injunction compelling the state to repay the Benefit Reserve Fund was effectively an award for "monetary relief that can only be satisfied by draws on a state's treasury," and thus… [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:26 pm
IC 33-27-3-1 provides: (a) When a vacancy occurs in the supreme court, the court of appeals, or the tax court, the clerk of the court shall promptly notify the chairman of the commission of the vacancy. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 8:41 am
The court of appeals issued an opinion stating in part, “the legislature unambiguously limited the definition of owner under the minimum-compensation statute to fee-title holders. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 12:28 pm
One of the earliest states to legalize same-sex marriage was Massachusetts when the Supreme Judicial Court ruled in 2003 in Goodridge v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 10:46 am
Everyone who pays taxes certainly. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:36 am
Here is the abstract: For over 150 years federal courts have held that Indian tribes have immunity from state taxes based upon the sovereignty of tribal lands. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 8:21 am
Lepis, 83 N.J. 139, 154 (1980) (noting that courts “should make greater efforts to provide in advance for change [so as to] enhance the stability of judicially fashioned arrangements and make unnecessary a return to court”). [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court has also held that a state can tax income of non-residents earned within that state. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:26 am
Judicial decrees, Kennedy wrote, gain legitimacy from the sparing use of judicial power. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:00 am
In a later case, the Supreme Court clarified that a ”court’s prior judicial construction of a statute trumps an agency construction otherwise entitled to Chevron deference only if the prior court decision holds that its construction follows from the unambiguous terms of the statute. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 6:52 am
Tax Court to challenge their 2008 tax assessment, and litigated the case up to the state's intermediate appellate court, the Appellate Division. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 3:00 am
It also notes that courts may take foreign taxes into account as expenses in their analyses even prior to administrative guidance on this issue. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
” Some courts become activist and frustrate the will of the state legislatures, while other courts abdicate their duty to say what the law is. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:05 am
Which may lead to New York state’s appellate courts better interpreting and clarifying the recent legislation, perhaps to ultimate good effect in New York’s family courts. [read post]
