Search for: "STATE v COOL"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,411
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm
Recently, seventeen states urged the Court to use California Sea Urchin Commission v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(China Law Blog) ‘Class’ justice in trademark rights: Lan Kwai Fong (IP Dragon) Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court: Unilever’s ice cream KING CONE did not infringe Danish trademark KING COOL (Class 46) New Danish rules on valuation of IP (Innovationpartners) Europe CFI: Lange Uhren watch shape appeal dismissed: Lange Uhren GmbH v OHIM (Class 46) CFI: no similarity between "MANGO adorably" and… [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am
(IP Dragon) Chinese brands not cool in UK? [read post]
6 May 2015, 10:53 am
In the recent case of Depuy Orthopaedics v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:30 am
The case is called Williams v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
Republicans have sponsored certain of these bills, but their commitment to this project has cooled. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 8:38 am
This time the decision is from the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the First Circuit (“BAP”). [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:54 am
See Wells v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 8:25 pm
Introduction On March 7, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit filed its opinion in the case of International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
to pay 23% ongoing royalty for future infringement: Creative Internet Advertising Corp. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:03 am
Subsequent to our decision, Respondents filed a petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the United States Supreme Court decided Cavazos v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 4:57 am
” I.R.C. v. [read post]
4 May 2014, 10:16 am
There is some value in being the cool kid when it comes to the film industry, which is clearly what New York is after. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 8:02 am
Medellin v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus patents: Rambus v Micron… [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:05 pm
Cool theory. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 7:10 pm
In light of Tuesday’s Supreme Court ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2018, 3:12 am
The settlement of the case, Trowbridge et al v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm
” Packingham v. [read post]
