Search for: "STATE v. WARREN" Results 881 - 900 of 2,123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2009, 4:35 am by JB
Virginia, decided in 1967 during the high water mark of the Warren Court. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:52 am by Amy Howe
At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, Emily Phelps recounts the testimony of North Carolina state senator Floyd McKissick at last week’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on a proposed constitutional amendment on campaign finance reform in light of the Chief Justice’s comments on donor influence in McCutcheon v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:17 am by Joshua Matz
Colb discusses the Court’s recent decision in Davis v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:59 am by James Bickford
  Today, the Court hears argument in McComish v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 6:07 am
Warren, 66 N.Y.2d 831, 832-33 (1985) with U.S. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 12:10 pm by Andrew Hamm
” Other memories are less reverent: Justice Potter Stewart, who had just quit smoking, chewing rubber bands during oral argument; or Chief Justice Warren Burger, who, rumored to ask at least one “dumb question” every argument, fulfilled that prediction during Little v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
ZXC v Bloomberg [2022] UKSC 5 This was the seminal privacy case of the year, decided by the UK Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 10:49 am
The statute in question, from the state of Washington, guaranteed women and minors just over 30 cents per hour. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 7:04 am by Just Security
Eisen (@NormEisen), Joshua Kolb (@JoshuaGKolb) and Andrew Warren Affirmative Action and International Law Racial Justice Without Affirmative Action: Embracing International Law after SFFA v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:09 pm by Anna Christensen
United States, limiting the scope of its 2005 ruling in United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:59 am by Jackie McDermott
“For any state that passes a law that violates the Constitution, and in particular Roe v. [read post]