Search for: "Sales v. State" Results 881 - 900 of 21,149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
The petition of the day is: Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 9:22 am by Jennifer Liu
In Morrison, the Court held the federal securities laws apply only to purchases or sales made “in connection with the purchase or sale of a security listed on an American stock exchange, and the purchase or sale of any other security in the United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 6:34 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
The court stated that Venture had not shown that the inventors and their attorneys knew the sale that occurred prior to the filing of the patent was material and had made a deliberate decision to withhold information about it. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:43 pm by Gareth
Court of Appeals ruling that the Copyright Act’s first sale doctrine applies only to goods first sold within the United States. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:18 am by Sheppard Mullin
 The Ninth Circuit's holding stated that the first sale doctrine would apply to foreign-made products if there was a sale in the United States authorized by the copyright owner because otherwise a foreign manufacturer would be afforded more protection from the U.S. copyright laws than a U.S. manufacturer. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Gerry W. Beyer
District Court lowered the trust fund penalties assessed against a person in the United States v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:01 am by Unknown
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court handed down a decision, , Tyler v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 11:50 am
  Our earlier posts cover both situations and today we’ve stumbled upon another example of the latter -- McCartney v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:27 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
"Second, the Court adopted other states' formulation for deciding how sale-of-business covenants were to be analyzed. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:59 am by Jeralyn
BTD has noted the dissent of Justice Stevens in today's decision in McDonald v. [read post]