Search for: "See v. See" Results 881 - 900 of 122,076
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2024, 4:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is speculative that Plaintiffs would claim and assume that they would have prevailed if the argument against the liquidated damages clause was made (see Lisi v Lowenstein Sandler LLP, 170 AD3d 461, 462 [1st Dept 2019] [rejecting plaintiff’s claim of proximate cause as merely speculative]; see also Sherwood Group v Dornbush, Mensch, Mandelstam & Silverman, 191 AD2d 292, 294 [1st Dept 1993] [finding that hypothetical course of events on which any… [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 3:04 am by Giles Peaker
But the principle that safety works are not maintenance per se is certain to see further application. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 10:30 pm by Sophie Dukarm
The answer – according to settled case law – is that the term ‘Member States’ refers to ‘government authorities of the Member States’ (see, for example, Région wallonne v Commission (para. 6.)). [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 11:48 am by DLA Piper LLP
IA-6368 (Aug. 23, 2023) (the Adopting Release) available at https://www.sec.gov/files/rules/final/2023/ia-6383.pdf.[2] National Association of Private Fund Managers v. [read post]
To qualify for such safe-harbor, a venture capital fund must: (i) issue interests to no more than 35 non-accredited purchasers of securities (see below), (ii) not offer or sell securities by any form of a general solicitation or general advertisement (see below), (iii) exercise reasonable care to assure that the purchasers of the securities are not underwriters and that the purchasers are not acquiring the securities for the purpose of resale; and (iv) file certain forms with the… [read post]