Search for: "Senior v. U.s.*" Results 881 - 900 of 1,005
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2009, 4:12 pm
(citing United States v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 3:03 am
The most important opinion generated during the case is here: United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
Ricci v DeStefano, United State Supreme Court, Docket Nos. 07-1428 and 08-328New York State's Constitution mandates that "appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive" [Article V, Section 6].* Other states have adopted similar… [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 1:10 am
Senior and Sloman, her sentiment does not disguise the fact that Cronin and Hoffman did not believe there was a need for disclosure or otherwise go to anyone to ask for direction on how to proceed. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Mar. 26, 2009)Affirming dismissal of fem manager's sex/discharge suitDC CircuitDouglas v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 1:21 am
Open filed an application with the Department of Health and Senior Services for a certificate of need for a proposed MRI facility. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 6:40 am
Judge Jolly's decision for a panel consisting of one of the most senior and the most junior of 5th Circuit judges, Judge Catharina Haynes, held that Hall Street Associates LLC v. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 10:59 pm
Likewise, inventories and records of controlled substances in schedules III, IV, and V must be maintained separately or in such a form that they are readily retrievable from the ordinary business records of the practitioner. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:44 am
California and the "Delaware Carve-Out" Keith Bishop reports on this development: A few weeks ago, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - in Madden v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:56 am
Davidson, 540 F.Supp.2d 1322, 1341-43 (N.D.Ga.2007); Brett Senior & Assocs., P.C. v. [read post]