Search for: "Short v. Downs"
Results 881 - 900
of 7,203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
The explosion is generally attributed at this point to a short circuit that caused the fuel tank to explode. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 2:34 am
In short, it is a software ownership dispute between our client (Mr Landamore) who is a highly skilled software engineer and Mr Wrenn who commissioned the software. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:01 am
The Supreme Court struck down this law as well, but not until 23 years later in Lane v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 7:56 am
Citing Jegley v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:02 am
” In 2017, the court struck down a provision that denied trademark registration to marks that are “disparaging” in Matal v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:00 am
Ross, IJ “Short Circuit” on Wingert v. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 1:44 pm
Lewis v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 12:02 pm
Further below, the record will play a greater role.In the very short term, the Tuesday hearing could clearly have gone better for Apple. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 8:38 pm
It is difficult to pin down the nature of the right Muñoz claims. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:44 am
Piers v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Case of Ahmet Atahür Söyler v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 8:39 am
State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 8:39 pm
Guided in part by initiatives announced subsequent to the book’s publication, including the Race to the Top program and the Obama Administration’s Blueprint for Reform, I maintain that today’s productivity agenda falls short in fulfilling Brown’s dual promise: to break down barriers that impede equal opportunity, and to preserve democratic government and the nation’s political standing as a world leader. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
But in a recent ruling, in Sessions v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:19 am
Back to Jones v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 10:20 am
Ct. 1101 (2015) and FTC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 2:17 pm
We can see the majority’s relaxed approach in its credulous acceptance of the government’s national security concerns: the Government exercised its considered judgment and concluded that mitigation efforts short of divestiture were insufficient, as a TikTok declarant puts it, to mitigate “risks to acceptable levels. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:08 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:17 pm
Attorney General, the Montana Supreme Court upheld a ban on corporate expenditures to speak in support of or opposition to political candidates — pretty much the same sort of ban that the United States Supreme Court struck down in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:50 am
In short--it isn't the individual land owners. [read post]
