Search for: "State ex rel. Justice v. State"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2016, 3:04 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
Civil rights plaintiffs seeking a fifth vote on the Supreme Court did not typically look to Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
U.S. ex rel. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' supplemental briefPetitioners' reply brief CVSG Information:Invited: March 21, 2011Filed: May 27, 2011 (Deny) Title: United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:52 am
” The full hearing came before Lord Justice Carnwath, Lord Justice Jackson and Mr Justice Hedley. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:07 am
Oklahoma ex rel. [read post]
31 May 2023, 7:56 am
The qui tam case is captioned U.S. ex rel. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:31 pm
Ongoing litigation in United States ex rel. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:45 am
United States ex. rel. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:49 pm
A list of this week’s featured petitions is below: U.S. ex rel. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 12:40 pm
A case filed by a transgender male student against the Gloucester, Virginia school board over his use of the boys’ restroom, G.G. ex rel. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:37 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 2:54 am
Ross, Short Circuit, on U.S. ex rel. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 3:30 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 12:35 pm
The opinion is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 4:54 am
In that case, it was clearly stated by Hale J that where: "An asset which was taken into account and correctly valued at the date of the hearing changes value within a relatively short time owing to natural processes of price fluctuation" ... [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:24 am
U.S. ex rel. [read post]
11 Jan 2025, 5:10 pm
(ACLU Explainer and Virtual Press Release, TikTok Inc., et al. v. [read post]