Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 881 - 900
of 12,645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2021, 2:05 pm
On December 15, 2021, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
United States.[7] The Court, however, quickly backed down from its anti-delegation rule in Schechter, possibly because of FDR’s court-packing plan. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:35 am
Today’s petition of the day is: Title: United States and California v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:00 am
All of this suggests that performance of the State Auditor’s functions involves seeing “that the law is faithfully executed” within the meaning of Article V, Section 1 of the California Constitution. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 3:56 pm
There Is No Federal Drug Testing Law for Private Employers in the United StatesCheck Your State - and Check With Counsel! [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 7:44 am
City of Ontario [California] v. [read post]
13 Mar 2003, 3:17 pm
Read Brown v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 11:16 am
United States, No.... [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 5:34 pm
APPEALS - ISSUES NOT DECIDED IN FIRST APPEAL United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 6:27 am
The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 9:33 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 6:46 am
The United States Federal District Court for the Central District of California recently held that there was no bad faith where the insurer had a reasonable basis upon which to genuinely dispute the insured’s claim. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 4:15 am
On December 14, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Adaptive Streaming Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
In a recent opinion, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed in part the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California’s grant of summary judgment to the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) in Friends of the River v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
State legislatures, we [have] pointed out, performed an ‘electoral’ function ‘in the choice of United States Senators under Article I, section 3, prior to the adoption of the Seventeenth Amendment,’ a ‘ratifying’ function for “proposed amendments to the Constitution under Article V,’ as explained in Hawke v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 12:48 pm
Starbucks Corporation (S234969) on whether California wage and hour law recognizes the de minimis doctrine established by the United States Supreme Court in Anderson v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 5:18 pm
People of the State of New York v Griepp 18-2454-cv, a case considering whether an injunction was warranted against several abortion protestors for protests outside an abortion clinic in Queens. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:38 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California certified a class of all women with claims for injunctive relief, declaratory relief, and back pay employed by Wal-Mart at any time after December 26, 1998, and created a separate opt-out class for punitive damages claims. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 12:46 pm
Today, the United States Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 8:54 am
Constitution's Supremacy Clause, "the laws of the United States . . . shall be the supreme law of the land . . . the law of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
