Search for: "State v House"
Results 881 - 900
of 28,753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
House Speaker Michael E. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 10:44 am
” The majority emphasizes that, in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 9:59 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 10:13 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:39 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 2:37 pm
” Friends of Lagoon Valley v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 10:39 am
Swindon BC v Redpath [2009] EWCA Civ 943 By s.153A(1) Housing Act 1996, a variety of social landlords, including local housing authorities, may apply for an injunction to restrain a person from engaging in “housing-related” anti-social behaviour. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:02 pm
The petition of the day is: One and Ken Valley Housing Group v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:21 am
Since the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 4:51 am
Clearing House Association [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that the National Bank Act (NBA) [12 USC § 484(a) text] and 12 CFR § 7.4000 [text] do not prevent a state from enforcing fair lending laws against national banks. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
Moreover, it cites cases as far back as the 1800s, including Merrill v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:31 am
Halkbank relies on Schooner Exchange v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:34 am
After Brown v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
The Outer House considered the cases of Hunter v Hanley [1955] SC 200 and Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 W.L.R. 582. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 4:21 pm
The Ninth Circuit (rightly) didn't feel like rewriting the order itself on the fly, and (rightly) didn't trust the non-binding interpretation of the order given by particular White House officials. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 9:10 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 10:44 am
In 1993, in the case of Amaratunge v Sirimal, Justice Mark Fernando of Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court made a remark that remains relevant. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:15 pm
In United States v. [read post]
